Has "fairness" become more important than freedom?
@ConservativeArtist (201)
United States
February 3, 2007 11:16am CST
I see today a disturbing trend in Western culture, in America and to an even greater degree in Europe. It is the underlying cause of rampant political correctness. The principle of equality and "fairness" has trumped the principle of freedom in the laws and actions of our culture. I have always believed in the importance of respect for other cultures, but not because it has been regulated by the government. I think we should all have equal freedoms. What we do with these freedoms is up to us. For instance, the cultural prohibition of Christian symbols on government property. I still have not heard how Christian symbols on government property actually diminishes the freedom of anyone else to practice their own religion. Or the fairness doctrine as it applies to radio broadcasts. As long as every side has the freedom to access the radio to present their message, why must every commentator on the radio be forced to give airtime on that show to opposing views? Newspapers and television broadcasts are not required to do this. Is it ok for the government to force us to be "fair" to others, even at the expense of our own freedom? Let me know what you think. (By the way, I DO support equal opportunity employment. I don't support affirmative action)
2 people like this
6 responses
@coslenchip (101)
• United States
6 Feb 07
Since there has been a lot of talk by one individual, I will just respond to the original qestion. PollyAndry is, of course, welcome to comment on my response.
Fairness does not equal freedom. Actually, to some extent, fairness is the oposite of freedom. In a completely free society, people are allowed to make their own decisions in any way they see fit. This would include not hiring someone who is homosexual if the owner feels that they will do a poor job. It also includes people not buying a company's goods because they do or do not hire homosexuals. (Obviously, homosexuality was used as an example.) Also, in a free society, people would be allowed to do anything they desire on their own property as long as it does not harm anyone else.
To cut a long rant short, freedom does not equal fairness. I was born to two parents, one of whom had a pretty good job my whole life. Someone else may have been born to a single mother making minimum wage. Is this fair to the child? No, not really. Does that mean that the government should collect all of the income from my parents and his mother and then give half of it to each of us. I SURE HOPE NOT. I find it fascinating that 50 years ago the average American was fighting for capitalism and was against socialism and communism. Now, the communists have convinced the average American that capitalism is evil and should be replaced. The average American's beliefs fall almost squarely on the ideas from the "Communist Manifesto".
In a completely free society, I have every opportunity to be whatever I want. In a completely fair society, I can only be one thing, what everyone else is.
1 person likes this
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
7 Feb 07
Great comment. It expressed a lot of points that I was trying to get out but couldn't for the life of me. I believe what makes America so great is its freedom of people to vote with their money, opinions and time. As long as everyone has the freedom to voice their opinions and "vote," then I think the best and most just arguments will win out.
Now, a person might say that this is not always perfect; look at the popularity of segregation in the South before the 1960s. This person might argue that it required the government to step in and fix this. I would argue that the government only stepped in after an overwhelming majority of people first "voted" with their money by boycotting buses in Alabama.
Again, I stress my belief that government should only be used for national defense and protecting our freedom. A government that tries to force equality on a people is tumbling down the slippery slope of socialism... and let's just see where Europe is at in 10 years. My guess is that they'll be fighting to re-establish some capitalism in their societies.
1 person likes this
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
11 Feb 07
Pollyandry, I am glad to see your support of capitalism. This shows that in America, we are all more the same than we are different. Affirmative action may have had its place earlier in the last century, but not in the 21st century! Now it only serves to promote racial differences. It is no longer appropriate. If I were to explain affirmative action to a minority, then he might infer from the policy that: 1. he is not good enough to compete on his own merit; OR 2. there are people in positions of power that don't want you in their institutions because of your race, so the government will step in to help. I think both messages today are wrong. The message the government should say: You can achieve anything you put your mind to and work for, and you will have access to anything anyone else of the same merit does, nothing more or less. If there is discrimination because of race, then a lawsuit should be filed, or a resignation tendered; but we should not simply assume that discrimination still exists to the degree that it did in the sixties. America is a very different place now.
Here's a question: What would Martin Luther King Jr think of affirmative action? Hmmm, that would make a good discussion in its own right. Gotta go!
@Lavera1 (896)
• United States
15 Feb 07
Yes making it against the law to place symbols of Christianty on public or government property is wrong. Our Congress says prayers before each of their meetings. And also all our constitution's laws are taken from the Bible. So that's saying that it's fair to be anti Christian in this society but let other interests and beliefs have their say.
@MrCoolantSpray (1005)
• United States
30 Mar 07
Clergymen from the community volunteer to say those prayers before political meetings. I've checked the rulings on it. It doesn't matter what creed you follow, you can put your name on the list and be at the town council meeting or wherever you want to lead the prayer. The Bill of Rights guarantees Freedom OF Religion. Not freedom FROM it. But the trend these days is to erase all evidence of Christianity from public grounds. Judaism and Islam dont' get that same treatment. Fair? No. But neither is it an example of freedom.
@ConservativeArtist (201)
• United States
16 Feb 07
Thank you for your response. Good points, although I wouldn't say that all of our constitution's laws are taken from the Bible directly, although they would all have their basis in Judeo-Christian morality. It's okay for anyone to worship any religion, as long as Christians can worship theirs. It is freedom of religion, not freedom from religion.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
30 Mar 07
The ironic thing is, "Fairness" has become a religion. Complete with dogma, doctrine and rituals. Also like religion, it is used as an excuse for abuse, bigotry and hatred.
In your example of Christian symbols. Isn't it ironic how often Christian symbols are removed because they "promote a religion", but then symbols of other religions or spirituality are allowed to stay up.
In the name of "fairness" we have denied jobs, political appointments, admission to schools and other things to people who are more qualified. In the name of "fairness" we have punished in the present, "to make up for the mistakes of the past". In other words, in the name of "fairness" we have denied fairness.
The fact is:
Fairness isn't fair and equality is never equal~ ParaTed2k's (Not So) Famous Sayings
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
30 Mar 07
In all of the talk about fairness and equal rights, the most fundamental right has been relegated to the back of the bus.
That is the right of the individual.
Our individual rights and freedoms have been trampled and lay broken by the stampede of fairness to all.
The greater good has trumped the rights of the few, or the one.
This is how society nows views freedom and fairness to all. In order to achieve fairness to all, fairness to a few has to be sacrificed.
The non-smokers rights have now become more important than the smokers rights. This is one of the most glaring examples, but not the only one.
In order to achieve the goals of overall freedoms and fairness, little groups must necessarily give way to the larger group, the collective, if you will.
A few years ago I learned a new term. It was some time during the Clinton Era, and was being used to express his political stance. He was said to consider himself a Statist.
Statism, as it was then explained, is where the greater good is favored even though some individual rights may be lost along the way. The needs of the whole outweigh the needs of the few or the individual.
This would explain the herd mentality that we are witnessing today, and why Clinton has remained popular despite his shortcomings.
This view makes me think of Socialism, and that has been a goal of the Democrats for a very long time. It don't care what they want to call it, a rose by any other name...
If we don't wake up very soon, soon it will be too late.
While the ideas of fairness are good, and everyone should be treated the same, at the same time this should not be done at the cost of individual freedom and right to free choice.
@AmbiePam (94106)
• United States
31 Mar 07
I agree with you. A lot of every day to day Americans do as well. The problem is that those every day Americans are not in the government. Somehow we've let the people who care more about fairness than right, take hold of the government we have. I don't know if this can every be rectified, but it sure as heck won't if we don't stand up and do something about it.
@MrCoolantSpray (1005)
• United States
30 Mar 07
We need more capitalism. Government handouts only encourage laziness. Affirmative action only encourages laziness. Why try, why work hard to climb the ladder when I can take the elevator because I'm black?
The only way to have racial equality is to be completely color blind. Take the "please state your ethnicity" questions off surveys, job applications, and standardized tests. Take small children, for example. Young white kids play with the young black kids until their racist parents tell them that black kids are bad. The white kids, who liked their friends and didn't notice nor care that their skin was a different color, learn to hate. I've seen it happen time and again.
A lot of American thought is based on the celebration of diversity. When you point out differences in people, it gives rise to hate. To re-forge ourselves as a strong, unified nation, we need to celebrate our similarities. We need to celebrate our American-ness, not our African American-ness, or Indian American-ness, or Chinese American-ness, or Mexican American-ness....