vegeterian vs Non-vegeterian

yes there is no point to discuss vegetarian is more powerful than nonveg...you can take examples of our great men like vivekanand and mahatma ghandi,,...

well i dont know which one is good and bad one, because i feel its totally depends on region where we stays, like someregion thy dont get enough vegetables and grain, so they have to depend on meat, and some region's people get a all kind of foods in plenty. So i guess its all about region and their needs as per weather, well as of my case is conern i am pure vegeterain!!!

I am both. When I was a child then I used to have only vegetarian food but after moving out of my hometown I started liking non-veg too and my husband also likes it a lot so now I eat non-veg more frequently. I am in US right now so we have more non-veg these days. When I have a lot of non-veg then I put a little control on myself to have just vegi. And I dont think that you should not be a non-vegetarian. Its fine to have non-veg too. But everything should be in limits. Thats all.

I think that humans were intended to eating meat and that is just nature. Unless you have some severe medical condition or your religion forbids it, there should be no reason why an individual should refuse eating anything that is related to meat. It is scientifically factual that humans are animals who have omnivorous characteristics, such as the ways our jaws and teeth are formed. We have sharp teeth in the front to rip apart flesh, and flat teeth in the back to grind vegetables. Human beings should be glad that there is food for them and if you are able to eat meat then you go ahead and eat it as others are starving. Nature is about survival and I dislike it when people start babbling how they beleive animals have rights and such. I think it is wrong to be a vegeterian if it does not involve religion or any other significant factor affecting ones diet.

i m vegetarian...i shud say i m pure vegetarian... n i will prefer for veg.......