Do you believe in Creation or Evolution?

Thanks for sharing your opinion and for the response. I think more people believed in creation than evolution. I'd like to hear more about people who believes in evolution I hope they share their opinion too. :D

Lol... Thanks for the response :D

Sorry if I simplified a little, just the thought that all we see around us would have been created without any intelligent creator behind it all seems to me so absurd. Well, if the evolutionists don´t believe in coincidence, they must have some explanation for all these extremely complicated forms of life so why can´t they convince intelligent people and all scientists? Why do they have to make up evidence if they really have all facts? There are scientists who sincerely believe in an intelligence behind everything - they are just brave enough to admit it. Professor Leisola from Finland was quoted in a newspaper after he had studied the evolution theory and he thinks that it is unconsistent, and was surprised that no other academic person had found out about this. Then he understood that it would not be popular if someone started teaching what is considered a fact by so many. It could affect their career and support money. What sort of scientist are those who have to use a sort of authority pressure to make people believe what they think is the truth? If they had enough evidence for their theory, they would just show the evidence and people could believe them.

Yes you have a point there, they're afraid to admit the truth and just stays quiet. Thanks for the response :D

OK, let's go point by point here. Forgive me for not quoting, but I'll try to keep the answers in order: - You are misrepresenting the theory of evolution by saying that everything exists "by coincidence". Natural Selection is simply the opposite of coincidence. Look it up. - The same goes for when you cite "atoms deciding to form all the insects, animals" etc. Again, that is not what the theory of evolution states. You are inventing a straw man and attacking it. The path from a single cell-based lifeform to higher and higher life forms took millions and millions of years of incredibly small and slow changes. The "magical" process you describe correlates to creationism, not evolution. - Once again, saying that a brain formed "by coincidence" is a blatant misrepresentation of the theory of evolution. - Regarding art, music and etc, you are actually getting into the field of evolutionary psychology, which does postulate many possible explanations for that. I'm sorry, but you should really look it up. - There are many scientists who are deists, and that is absolutely no secret. Nevertheless, only a few negate the theory of evolution, because to do that they have to put their religious dogmas above their intellectual honesty and their respect for science and evidence. Yet, they exist, and their arguments - and the proper rebuttal and explanation for their shortcomings - is easily found on the internet. If you are sincerely willing to inform yourself more about the theory of evolution - and I think you'd gain much for it, to avoid misrepresenting it like in this post - you could try the website www.talkorigins.org .

hmm, do you think after another 1,000 years human will evolve to something new? and also we have so many discoveries about bacteria and kinds of bacteria do you think another 1,000 years they will evolve again to another kind of apes?

...yes, they do know where the "ape" came from. They have a very definite timeline, starting from bacteria.

Mankind has reached a point where there is very little selective pressure for more evolutionary changes. Not only that, but 1.000 years is a very, VERY short time when you're talking about the evolution of a species. You don't have to fear bacteria will change into a different, way more complex species in such a short time. But bacteria *are* continually evolving, even today. That's why antibiotics lose effectiveness with use.

Lavera1, You're correct, evolution is theory. A scientific theory. Please check out the definition of the word so that you can verify that we're on the same page. http://wilstar.com/theories.htm "How can a bacteria evolve into a fish or a ape." It takes a VERY long time, with very minute changes taking place from one species to the next. "And if we humans were evolved from apes why are there still apes in the earth?" A common peice of misinformation. Humans and apes share a common ancestor, we didn't evolve from them. In other words, we share the same evolutionary tree which is backed up by DNA evidence. "All evolution is trying to prove is that God doesn't exist and plenty of evolutionist scientists have left that false religion and joined creation truth." Judging from your response thus far, you know very little about evolution. Do you have any credible evidence to support your claim of defecting scientists? As others have already mentioned, evolutionary theory and creation are two very different things. One claims to know how life and the Universe came into existance, while the other simply explains how species evolve through genetic mutation. Apples and oranges, but I digress.

Yes all evolution is is theory. How can a bacteria evolve into a fish or a ape. And if we humans were evolved from apes why are there still apes in the earth? All evolution is trying to prove is that God doesn't exist and plenty of evolutionist scientists have left that false religion and joined creation truth. Infact science is proving each day that the bible is true.

Well, I don't know what do you want me to explain, so here are both : The Theory of Evolution deals only with life, altough how this life was originated is a related field of research, related because it is on biology, the Theory of Evolution deals with life, its changes over time, why it changes, etc. and on this planet, should we ever find another planet with life, it is a possibility that the Theory of Evolution as we know is aplicable there, but only this. And the origin of the universe is far older than earth (universe something around 15 billion years, and earth with 4,5 billion years or something) and again as the most modern theories say. Why I do not believe in the creation as related in the bible. First I do not have belief in the existence of any God, second the amount of fossil records, and genetic evidence is better explained by the Theory of Evolution. And another thing is : Why is the creationism as in the bible right and not other creationisms from other religions? For example, the bible states that men and women were created by god, why did this God created also chimpanzees with such a similarity?, Another thing, how could from a couple, one single couple, all the diversity that humans have , come? Did god created more human? Yes, No? If yes, is there any point in the bible were it is clearly stated, if not, why? See, lots of questions and a supernatural being where none is needed.

Thanks for the response. Can you explain to us why?

Thanks for the response :D

Thanks for the response :D

God is Spirit, from everlasting to everlasting; nobody created Him. He says I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End (Revelation 21:6; 22:13)

Definitely true, thanks for answering his question.

Yes because of the seventh day He rested, thanks for the correction. I think 1 day to God is equivalent to 1,000 years to man. I just couldn't remember the verse where it's stated.

The 1,000 years to a day is found at 2 Peter 3:8 which says: "And let not this one thing hide from you, beloved, that one day in the presence of the Lord is as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day" [quoted from THE WILL New Testament (Greek to English)].

Thanks for the response :D