Who is better Munaf or Sreeshanth?

MY VOTE IS FOR MUNAAF PATEL, munaf patel is the only indian bowler who took 10 wickets in one day match.sreesanth is also good but not as munaf, Kkittu:)

I am also voting for sree.He is an agressive player and good for India and Indain people.

i wouldnt think on those lines sreesanth is not suited for onedays as his outswingers generally make the batting easy ....whereas munaf is a la mcgrath he cramps the batsmen very much and they have no option but to go for ambittious shots ..and he is also very economical so that is what you want in one days .....in the south africa series munaf would have been a huge hit with the ball but because of injuries i"m not saying sreesanth is bad but he is not suited for one days

both of them are very good..but i prefer sreesanth

both r good and i don want any comparisons.

myvote is also for sreesanth .he bowled fentasticly in south africa tour .but we cant tell that he is better than munaf patel .he also prooved his talent better than in so many matches .he has the talent to control the run rate .also he can more LBWs in the match

I think Munaf Patel is better bcoz he doesn't give runs like Sreesanth, Sreesanths's economy rate is very high, he much expensive bowler than Munaf