Who is better for world cup ( sreeshanth or munaf)
By cap_leo18
@cap_leo18 (357)
India
February 8, 2007 2:12pm CST
My vote is for sreeshanth,sreeshanth is good for bowling in abroad pitches than munaf , and also he is good in fielding and is full active player through out the match , we cant forget what he shows to the nel "wow to say" when he do that dance infort of him i rembered about the gangulies performance against flintoff after winning the match
1 person likes this
5 responses
@arijitdreams (401)
• India
9 Feb 07
i think both should be taken for th wc and both should be given a chance.
@cap_leo18 (357)
• India
9 Feb 07
yeah you are righ, both must be chosen they must be selected on the world cup games accordinfg to the type of pitch that supports their bowling style
@Booker_t79 (200)
• United States
8 Feb 07
i think it would depend on who is better at batting too. since both are good bowlers we need some one who cna score at 10-20 runs down the order. this should be considered if deciding between two bowlers with same bowling type
@cap_leo18 (357)
• India
9 Feb 07
i agree with your response but one think we have to consider is that our batsman are not scoring these 10 -20 runs then how could we depend on bowlers to score such runs
@jinxed666 (562)
• India
8 Feb 07
i think munaf is more consistent than sreesanth in one dayers ,as in short version of cricket u need bowlers u can control there line and length and take some wickets also, i think munaf is right kind of person ,who has an accuracy like mcgrath and pitches almost evry ball in right corriders and the thing with sreesanth is that no doubt he is quick but always goes for runs and doesnt havre control over line and length
@cap_leo18 (357)
• India
8 Feb 07
yeah you are 100 % right but the attitude must be consider for the game , you can see how lazy is this munaf in fielding and if we consider for the attitude sreeshanth must be rated high ,munaf is consistent only in runs giving not in taking wickets ,in one day wickets also have some importance because wickets all changes the match
@yogeshreddy (194)
• India
9 Feb 07
my opinion is both are the better bowlers for indian team .sreesanth can bowl well in opening spell ,but after that he will give more runs per over .but munaf patel can control the runrate by over by over.he take more LBW in the match
@JITENDRA1987 (28)
• India
19 Feb 07
munaf is better:
1)he is more accurate just like mcgrath
2)his economy is less as compared to sreesanth.
a)he is not at all good batsman.
b)he is not agressive.
3)he is not good fielder.
in all looking his bowling capabilities he is better
