Shroud of Turin
By Krisss
@Krisss (1231)
Australia
February 11, 2007 5:38pm CST
Anyone got an opinion on this? A few years ago it was carbon dated and they said was proved to not be as old as it would need to be to be the burial cloth of Christ. But recent tests have shown that the fibres that were carbon dated were part of a mended piece of the cloth.
If it is a fraud, what is it and how did the image get on the piece of cloth?
1 person likes this
3 responses
@grinjaguar (571)
• Philippines
11 Feb 07
i bet its the blood all over the body that is imprinted on the shroud. Real or not, the question is... Does that affect or change your faith? Does your faith lie on the piece of shroud?
1 person likes this
@Krisss (1231)
• Australia
12 Feb 07
I tend to agree, I want to believe it is the burial cloth of Christ, but I would really like some scientific evidence too.
What else can it be? The imprint is believed to be of the body at the exact moment of resurection because of the way the feet are placed.
@nbcastillo (32)
• Philippines
23 Jul 10
I just watched a documentary about the shroud of turin from history channel a while ago. I want to believe that it was all the result of leonardo da vinci's brilliant mind. There is overwhelming evidence presented, but still i will conduct some more research on this. I'm just concerned of what the roman catholics are doing, they have a picture of this in every church. It seems, it's easier to prove that its not the face of Jesus than the other way around. And i wonder why the catholic church won't allow further test conducted on that shroud.