Should john wright be brought back for indian cricket team?

No, I wish to highlight the following. 1. Greg helped pathan become an allrounder by promoting him to 1 down in batting. If pathan lost his pace and precision, it can't be chappel's fault. 2. By boldly showing the door for seniors who were not performing to potential, like ganguly and zaheer khan, he had made them pull up their socks and give their best to the team as we are seeing now. 3. May be first time in history we are having pace bowlers who can bowl around 135 to 145 km/hour consistently like munaf, VRV singh due to chappel's insistence on finding fast bowlers who could make batsmen hurry. 4. By experimenting, we have discovered cricketers like karthik and uthappa, who are getting international chances consistently and performing. Especially, it is heartening to see the talented dinesh karthik finding a place in the team as a batsman. 5. I can say confidently that the indian team is more aggressive now than before but even now, they should become better in this aspect. 6. Barring 1 or 2, the fielding has considerably improved under chappel, especially catching. 7. I feel the contributions of chappel are predominantly long term and this is too early to assess him. 8. The only thing I am disappointed with him is in the selection of sehwag, but as newspapers reported, dravid was the man behind the decision, not chappel. In conclusion, I feel that if the board or captain don't intervene, chappel should be able to do a better job than now. It is because, he is from australia, where there is a conscientious, healty, performance oriented open debate before the national squad is chosen. Personal preferences don't take anyone anywhere there. He is from THAT system, remember, and I duly believe that he is capable of improving team india better in the days to come without succumbing to the usual whims and fantasies of personal gain. Thanks.

I think John wright and Greg Chappell..both of them are really good coaches but i would prefer john wright