If the past tense of "ring is "rang", the past tense of "bring" is "brang"?

No! Clearly the past tense of "ring" ought to be "rought." all the best urban

You would think so but English is too complicated.You will pull your hair out trying to make sense of the rules of English grammar.

no, it isn;t true the past tense of verb "bring is "brought" this are irregular verbs... so they aren't the same... but i have a list that group them after their writing!

It's English, so a the conjugating of verbs can be a little on the complicated side. It happens in every language, just more in English. You can't always apply common sense to language.

You are right in your logic. You would think that it should be brang, but I would like you to notice: I rang you today on the phone. (rang = simple past) No, I haven't rung the item up yet. (rung = past participle). I brought a book with me to your house. (brought = simple past) I've brought the groceries in the house and I am not putting them away (brought = past participle) So, if you change it with bring to brang then you will have three different forms: bring, brang, brought. I think it is complicating the language even more! :( Pablo

ha ha nice doubt...I too hate english for such bad language structures... Think like this way and leave it Coal after some time becomes Diamond and some other Coal after some time still coal..