Did Neil Armstrong really landed on the moon?????
By healer
@healer (1779)
India
February 20, 2007 12:49pm CST
I heard a lot of controversies that Neil Armstrong never landed on the moon. Many points are given against it some are:-
1) There is only one light source in the moon i.e the sun so there has to be only one line of shadow on the pictures but it shows various lines of shadows.
2) There was no stars on the background from pictures taken from the moon.
3) And in the pictures it shows that the flags were waving in the airless moon as we have read on books.
So, what do you say about landing on the moon?? Did NASA really fixed this moon landing and if so why??
2 people like this
11 responses
@urbandekay (18278)
•
21 Feb 07
Ok, lets put an end to this hoax nonsense once and for all.
1. The Russians would have been monitoring the landing
2. Had the US not landed there the Russians would have let everyone know since it would have been to their advantage
3. If the Russians had let on then it would have been in the papers of every country
all the best urban
2 people like this
@PatSays (30)
• United States
21 Feb 07
I'm sorry but those arguments are horrible.
1)There is only one shadow direction but depth perception on the moon is different. "Small boulders" on the moon might actually be faraway "mountains."
2) The cameras they used to take photographs "accepted" less light than normal due to technology constraints and because it prevented glare. The exposure time on your digital camera does the same thing. Stars are naturally dimmer and thus won't be picked up as easily.
3) The flag was waving due to vibrations from installment.
NASA did not fix the moon landing and the special that Fox showed was an absolute joke that was just attempting to gather ratings/publicity/viewers. Do you honestly think people at NASA would forget stars in their picture if that was the reason? How could they 'forget' that there is no atmosphere on the moon either. I'm sad that such ignorance has gained so much influence. Hopefully I resolved your doubt.
1 person likes this
@john_essex (199)
•
23 Feb 07
Well done for an excellent response to this question. Saved me form having to type an answer! Yes, Neil did really land on the moon! If all goes well we may even one day put somebody on mars!
1 person likes this
@maribel1218 (3085)
• Philippines
27 Feb 07
I really think Neil Armstrong landed on the moon because if he is not and the story is all hoax then I really think the russian goverment will be the one to spill the news to humiliate NASA right?
As additional there are lots of man and woman working on NASA and affiliate department concern on this project if this is not true someone from them will surely make a news out of it that was for me is a logical thinking of that matter.
@maribel1218 (3085)
• Philippines
30 Mar 07
Hi! thanks for this discussion I really browse the story and it was really bit confusing but once you knew what is real then you wouldn't be confuse.
Thanks for the best tag!
@Harpreet_1988 (85)
• Australia
23 Feb 07
its kind of a case of weather the egg came first of the chicken? ehhe i mean we can never know even if it was a hoax it was certainly carried out by some of the most intelligent people and also by some of the biggest government people in the world and im sure the secret will never be revealed.
@sarkar121 (63)
• Pakistan
26 Feb 07
who told u tat u see stars shining from up there .from up there u see earth shining like a moon.n the signs he told r true.he has landed on the moon surface
@muralimn (534)
• United Arab Emirates
26 Feb 07
Oh.. this is a news for me. I never imagined that it can be like this. All that we are taught at school is wrong then i believe. I hope someone clear the doubts.
@shrey_aryan (350)
• India
27 Feb 07
my mind and the astronaut department both says that he landed ther but why r these contradictions coming up?we can't predict what's wrong and what's right?so it's better not to discuss on this?
