What do you think that what should be CRITERIA for CONTRACT of CRI player?
By 1234paresh
@1234paresh (239)
India
February 21, 2007 12:56am CST
WHAT do u think about that what should be criteria for the CRICKET players of india ; wether it is based on PERFORMANCE or it is based on SENIOURITY?
Indian player said to BCCI that it should be based on SENIOURITY.what do u think about that n why?
Ithink it should be based on PERFORMANCE.
1 person likes this
2 responses
@unishwetabh (1031)
• India
21 Feb 07
Performance is really important for the team to come up. But then one can't ignore the seniority. The experience really counts. So the selection squad should come up with the perfect mixture of both. Its a tough job but someone has got to do it. The best team should be selected that has all the ingredients what it takes to win the matches.
1 person likes this
@1234paresh (239)
• India
21 Feb 07
ya you r right the selection squad should consider all those things.
thanks for responce.
@banta78 (4326)
• India
21 Feb 07
I strongly freel that performance or merit should be the main criteria for awarding contracts to players. Since those who perform should be suitably rewarded this will motivate those players to do much better and will also serve an encourgement for all players to give their best. and seniors who don't perform will also feet the heat and perform otherwise they will take their places in indian team for granted which should not be the case. Moreover if they performed well in past they were paid & rewarded suitably then, and you don't get paid in job this year for what you did last year, so thing should needs to be applied here too. So accountability should brought into indian team and then their performances will become consistent. And players adversely affected will surely protest but if Indian cricket borad is firm they will fall in line.