Camera for starters

@hellboi (661)
Philippines
February 22, 2007 6:58pm CST
For the pros out there, what camera would you recommend for starters in this field? Is it advisable to buy a DSLR or just the typical digital camera?
5 responses
@jayperiod (870)
• United States
23 Feb 07
If money is not an issue, I'd go with a DSLR. You can get a Nikon D40 for around $500 (6MP), or a Nikon D80 or Canon Rebel XTi (10MP) for around $800. All of these will have many program settings which will allow you to learn adjusting shutter and aperture settings. If it were film, that would be a little expensive and time consuming, but with digital, there's no added cost. If money is an issue, then there are many quality point and shoot digis. I'd go with a good name, Canon, Kodak, Fuji, to name just a few. You'll want to get a good megapixel rating and one with good quality. http://www.cnet.com is a great site for reviews and comparisons. Also, http://www.popphoto.com is a great magazine site that's very helpful.
@hellboi (661)
• Philippines
23 Feb 07
would it not be difficult to use a dslr? i mean, does it require much skill that a newbie could not possibly handle? or you can just learn everything from then?
@hellboi (661)
• Philippines
23 Feb 07
Well thanks a lot! I think I'll just brave out the odds and get a DSLR.
• United States
23 Feb 07
That's the wonderful thing about them. They have settings that are basically like a point and shoot. Then, as you learn, you can experiment with more adjustments. I see no problem using it as a learning camera. If you took a class, they'd ask you to buy either a film or digital SLR. Don't let it scare you off. Once you start on it and see your results, you'll be glad you didn't go with a point and shoot.
• United States
23 Feb 07
I'd recommend starting with film, but only if you can get access to a darkroom. The darkroom experience is something that if you have the opportunity to do, you should. It's more fun than digital, and feels more rewarding. Also, a film slr is about 1/5 the cost of a digital one. Pretty much any slr these days has the automatic settings and the manual settings. So, pick whatever's in your budget. A digital slr is a hefty price to shell out for a starter.
• United States
23 Feb 07
I'll admit that the initial cost of a film SLR is far less than that of a digital SLR, but with the cost of film and processing, it only takes about 90 rolls to even out the cost. Even doing all the darkroom work, it would even out somewhere around 150 rolls. When I started, I bet I went through a good 50 or 60 rolls before I even started making any money. The darkroom experience would definitely be one to have, but for the experience only. I don't think cost is really an issue.
@feris0604 (303)
• Malaysia
27 Mar 07
My advice .... since you have been using a point and shoot camera, and feel that you want to advance to know how to control your shutters and things like that, you should get a prosumer camera. A prosumer camera looks a little like a DSLR, but smaller. Some of the manufacturers even gave the users free hand to tweak their cameras. The price? some of them are lower than entry level digital cameras. Shop around and see what you is suitable for you. Don't rush into making a decision just because the salesperson (who know nothing of cameras) tell you wonderful things about the gadget.
@YuhMin (63)
• United States
23 Feb 07
Have you worked with SLR cameras before, or have you only had experience with point-and-shoot cameras? I'm not a pro, but I didn't attempt to even use an SLR until I was comfortable with the photography basics (films speed, shutter speed, light variations and how to adjust your camera, etc). I find that if you are just starting to get serious about photography but don't know that much, then make sure you are comofortable with your point-and-shoot first. Then, move onto the more expensive SLR, where you can build upon your experience and experiment. Hope that helps. And above all, HAVE FUN!
@hellboi (661)
• Philippines
23 Feb 07
Thanks for the advice! I have used point-and-shoot cameras a lot but not in a precise manner as photographers do. I just want to learn some lessons or perhaps explore on my own and I don't want to limit my learnings just because my camera has very limited capabilities. Do you think it is wise for me to invest in DSLRs then?
• United States
23 Feb 07
I'd reccomend a point-and-shoot first because they are more user friendly and you can get used to photography easier. Also DSLR's are a lot more money and thats a lot to spend for something you might not be good at or might not end up enjoying as a hobby. I just bought a canon G7...its kinda of in-between a point and shoot and a DSLR (altho classified as a point and shoot). There's not a lot of cameras in that inbetween category but that's a way to go too.
@hellboi (661)
• Philippines
23 Feb 07
I've also been eyeing the G7 but the size and price difference with a 400D ain't that much so I'm leaning towards getting a the 400D. Any more thoughts?