iran's foreign minister: u.s. is in no position to attack??
By liranlgo
@liranlgo (5752)
Israel
February 25, 2007 4:19am CST
mottaki said that after the dick cheney renewed washington's warning: "that al options are on the table if tehran continues to defy u.s.demands to halt uranium enrichment..
mottaki says that the u.s. is just "talkin" they will not do anything cause they can not afford to start a third war..
what do you think?
is mottaki right?
is the u.s. just talking and will not to nothing cause they cant afford another war now?
let me here your opinion
5 responses
@Aussies2007 (5336)
• Australia
26 Feb 07
Don't think for a second that the US don't have a capability to sart a war with Iran. They have enough to start half a dozen wars if they needed to. These are the key words "needing to".
Besides that... The English can take Iran out by themselve. And so can the French.
Moslems people are simply not very smart. They keep taking their ambitions for realities. We saw that with Saddam Hussein. Twice! The mother of all wars.
1 person likes this
@Aussies2007 (5336)
• Australia
26 Feb 07
Everyone knows that the US is a military superpower who can take on any country in the world because they have air superiority and will bomb you into the ground before sending any ground force troops in.
So... in my book... any country which challenge the US into a duel... has to be stupid. It might be a question of pride... but it is still stupidity.
You cannot be smart and a hateful fanatic at the same time.
Smart people don't put the lives of their citizen at risk by declaring a war that they cannot possibly win.
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
27 Feb 07
The US would not even have to send any troops.
All it would take is for Congress to pop for some jet fuel, and then carpet bomb Iran back into the Stone Age at our leisure.
Personally, I fail to see what all the fuss is about.
1 person likes this
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
26 Feb 07
Well its not the US, its the UN. And yes, the UN will continue to do nothing because that is the only thing its good for.
The US, however, might act and hopefully before Iran does something REALLY stupid.
1 person likes this
@LittleMel (8742)
• Canada
26 Feb 07
I'm not American but our government sent troops to Iraq too. I don't see any reason why anyone would think that the US is just talking, although I have no idea what their budget situation is.
I just hope that the US think twice before attacking Iran. They attacked Iraq which is Iran's enemy, and now look what Iran is doing? They armed Afghanistan to fight Russia back, then Osama's people went hijacking planes and blew up WTC. It's never ending and we keep sending our own people to get killed somewhere else instead of protecting our own country.
