Are you pro or con on animal testing?
By hottie0728
@hottie0728 (1732)
United States
February 28, 2007 8:01pm CST
I am not really con but definitely not on the pro side.
I think that animal testing should only be used on medical purposes like trying to find out what's the cure of some disease. Animal testing is usually used in cosmetics too. I believe that they shouldn't do that to such innocent animals.
Are you aware of the products that you use? Do you look at the label and see if they have not tested animals on their product?
Some of the brands that I knew that do not use animal testing are...
Paul Mitchell
Yardley
Colgate
Palmolive
Revlon
Freeman
Bath and Body works
The Body Shop
Are you gonna be conscious on what you buy now?
1 person likes this
3 responses
@princesskaos15 (235)
• United States
2 Mar 07
I've always thought that I was against animal testing, however I admit that I'm not fully aware of what companies test their products on animals, so I'm not really sure where that puts me. I'm more aware now than I was, though, so that has to count for something, right?
@hottie0728 (1732)
• United States
1 Mar 07
Oh thanks!
I didn't know that The Body shop is now owned by L'Oreal. Those product infos are given by my schoolmate on their research. They didn't do a good research then, lol. Thanks again!
@Slim_Shady (668)
• Romania
1 Mar 07
One part of me tell's me that animal testing is ok , because , the products that i'll buy will be safe for me , but the other part says that it's not fair ! That the animal .... deserve a voice that can stand up for them whenever the case !
1 person likes this
