virus vs antivirus
By money01
@money01 (85)
Indonesia
March 2, 2007 1:58am CST
do u agree or disagree , if development of virus was faster than antivir ?
6 responses
@Phlamingho (7824)
• Denmark
3 Mar 07
The antivirus can't be written until there's a virus for it to cure, so of course the virus is faster than the antivirus.
@AlexMasters (247)
• Philippines
6 Mar 07
Agree, in the sense that an antivirus maiin purpose is to delete or disinfect a virus, in other words, a virus has to be created first,before a cure can be made for it, sometimes however, antivirus developers are able to anticipate upcomming viruses so they are able to develop a cure for them beforehand.
@kerbausama (1335)
• Malaysia
3 Mar 07
yeah..i guess egg first before chicken thats why virus proliferate first before antivirus..antivirus developed to counter the antiirus.hence they need new virus to get new product.but i think this virus they creat it themselves and announce they get the 'med' for it.thats how they make money..
@hellhunter (273)
• United States
2 Mar 07
I think that the big programming companies design the viruses themselves and release their antivirus products to make profits.
@lordwarwizard (35747)
• Singapore
2 Mar 07
This is a trick question... this must be. :P
How can you develop a virus killer unless the virus first appear?
So definitely, the development of virus will be faster than the anti virus to combat it.
@emiliano75 (680)
• Italy
2 Mar 07
We must ask to ourself "who create viruses?" if we discover this we can understand :-)