umaga vs khali
By raj_singh
@raj_singh (20)
India
5 responses
@lonewolfnan (4366)
• Canada
12 Mar 07
I am not sure we will see a match between these two as both are heels and both on a roll.Khali has a height size,but still has not shown me any wrestling skills/abilities.Umaga has shown he can take a beating as well as give one.If Khali is taken off his feet (something I think Umaga can do) then the match would definately be in Umaga's favour.
@firstcontact1990 (1784)
•
24 Aug 07
I agree, especially as Umaga is much faster than Khali, and for his size, he is fast.
@firstcontact1990 (1784)
•
12 Mar 07
Of Course not, Kane is established himslef in the WWE, and is probably a future hall of famer, and is a leged, mabye not on the same wavelength of Undertaker, but he can still be a legend. Kane will win, he is much better, it doesnt matter about size.
@soumodeep (944)
• India
12 Dec 07
Umaga got no chance against Khali. So what if he's fast, he doesn't have any capabilities either. I mean common Khali has taken down faster wrestlers. Khali has completely destroyed Undertaker too who is bigger then Umaga and faster then Umaga and overall better then Umaga. Umaga will be a piece of cake for Khali. Khali rocks!!!
