The DaVinci Code

@stacyv81 (5903)
United States
March 25, 2007 10:28am CST
Why is it that we think this famous painter had all of the answers, and no one else knew what he knew and he gave us clues in hispaintings? Who is he that he would be the only one who knew? Do you really believe that?
1 person likes this
2 responses
@Jennifer21 (2476)
• United States
25 Mar 07
Actually yes, I do believe it. DaVinci was the Grand Master of the Priory of Sion. Everyone in the Priory of Sion knew of these truths and kept them secrets.
1 person likes this
• United States
25 Mar 07
And The DaVinci Code is not just based on these paintings. It is also based on many other things such as many historical facts that point in that direction. It is more of a realistic personification of the past. If you do your research into the history you will see that The Davinci Code holds some truths. I'm not saying it is all true, but who really knows the truth anyways, no one. It is all just based on faith anyways.
1 person likes this
@Debs_place (10520)
• United States
25 Mar 07
TheThe book by Dan Brown, intimated that DaVinci has all of the answers, and we really don't know that he did or he didn't. But DaVinci was a genius, that we do know. Maybe he did know, maybe he had access to documents that no longer exist, maybe he was asked to buy clues, because the had the mind and the talent to do this. Like so many other things that have occurred, we may never know the old story. As people we want all of or ducks lined up, so we connect the dots and maybe sometimes those connections don't really exist, but they seem logical. Maybe we connect the wrong dots or maybe we connect the right ones. The point being, that we should keep an open mind, we may never know the truth or we may find what is thought to be a truth isn't. Look at the discussion around the Shroud of Turin - what people have thought for all these years to be true, is proably a brilliant hoax, but we do know that it logically does not work, yet we can not find how it was made, it is an interesting paradox.
1 person likes this