Evolution or creation?

Philippines
March 26, 2007 11:28am CST
Guys what do you really think? Support your beliefs..
2 responses
• United States
31 Mar 07
Evolution is a farce. Scientific laws discredit evolutionistic viewpoints on how the earth came about. Fossil records are used as evidence, but we can find many people walking around today with disorders that cause their bodies to be contorted, which 'millions of years' from now could be mistaken for something else if you didn't know better. We're told we evolved from monkeys over time, but why then do we still have monkeys and humans but no mankeys? When did the evolution stop. That itself is proven with DNA and how close it is, but even that has a lot of margin of error. If you want to talk about DNA, humans are more closely related to the sunflower than we are to the monkey. They say things like the grand canyon took millions of years to form, yet the colorado river flows uphill through the grand canyon, contradicting gravity, and we only need to point to Mt. Saint Helens to show that the landscape can be significantly altered and the heat and pressure can form layers of rock in mere hours, which other locations the world over are claimed to be millions of years old.
@Stringbean (1273)
• United States
26 Mar 07
I think they are making an argument where one doesn't need to exist. It is clear that even if evolution is true and that all life descended from a single cell, someone had to have created that single cell. Therefore, there must be a creator. If there is a creator, why not believe the creation account the Bible gives of how we came to be here. It makes a lot more sense to me than the evolutionist's theory.