Arsenal
By MrX
@Tko2020 (266)
10 responses
@aquarian1986 (32)
• Pakistan
2 Apr 07
hmm nah i fynk k arsenal doo have top playerz nd no need to be bought up like chelsea !!!
1 person likes this
@anik30 (71)
• India
2 Apr 07
I don't agree with you on that, right now arsenal have a good balance of youth players with some experienced ones.they don't need any more big name or high salary consuming players,
as already mentioned by a few guy's above sheva and ballack have not actually done any magical stuff for chelsea.It's just that the bunch of young players have not matured enough till now, but they (arsenal)are surely a front runner for next years league and european championships.
1 person likes this
@hitesh23 (233)
• Hong Kong
2 Apr 07
I think its fair to say that now it is Arsenal's turn to be taken over. manchester, Chelsea and liverpool have all been purchased by foreign businessmen.
Arsenal need some funds in their transfer kitty to challenge for at least a cup next season I think!
1 person likes this
@daloosmanu (7)
• India
3 Apr 07
Arsenal is a classic team in EPL....,they got talents sure....they can mak any team defeated.Players lik Hendry,Van persie,Baptista,Toure and Gilberto r world class players....But in these days,they in not in the rhythm....Hendry was hurt.But i think they can still mak a difference.....
@djdeep81 (1061)
•
6 Apr 07
Arsenal dont need to be taken over by a billonaire. Not only will players find it difficult to get a run in the team, the relationship between the manager and the players will break up. Arsenal play with flair and it takes time to play like that. Chelsea are boring to watch and the so called big players just wanna make an appearance and go home with their salary. Its best not to spend big like chelsea have done. At the end of the day its all about winning but i guarantee, arsenal will be up there next season.