If RUSH LIMBAUGH were to decide to run for United State's President would you
By CarlyLaine
@CarlyLaine (759)
United States
April 4, 2007 6:54am CST
vote for him?
I would and here's why....I am a CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN. I think he's extremely intelligent and 99.99% correct on his assessment of LIBERAL Democrats (I was going to say 100% correct, but I didn't want you to think that I think that he is perfect-so 1% is for his humananity) He understands HISTORY. He understands from where the United States came and where the US is going-if we don't shut down the LIBs and win CONGRESS and the Presidency.
I know I am going to be give a lot of flack from many. I am up to the challenge, ok?
Let's go!!!!!
5 people like this
7 responses
@lightningMD (5931)
• United States
5 Apr 07
Well CarlyLAine, I too thaught at one time that Rush had all the answers but then I started to realy listen to him. I am VERY Conservative and all of my life have voted Republican. FOr the last 2 years I have seen that Rush is PURE Republican and can not find fault in anyone who is Republican. I now believe that Rush has last his sight in pointing out the wrongs of politics and I could not vote for him. We have to keep an open mind with all polititions because no matter what party they come from THEY LIE.
2 people like this
@CarlyLaine (759)
• United States
5 Apr 07
lightningMD
I think we need to hear both sides and weigh them also. He encourages people to listen to both....because we must realize the agenda.
Oh, but he gets so ticked at Repubs who sell out. He has much consternation concerning them.
He understand the agenda of the LIBERAL LEFT ...and on that he is EXACTLY correct.
The LIBERALs are notorious liars as a whole...but there is no challenge from the left concerning these slimey wonders.
1 person likes this
@flowerchilde (12529)
• United States
4 Apr 07
...hello CarlyLaine.. my sympathies are with you opening up discussion on this! It's far more popular to be an extreme on the other end and dismantle our volunteer army, our law enforcement and border patrol.. after all people are evolving into little angels and a military and law enforcement are no longer needed.. that's why child rapists can get probation, cuz, well, they're just misunderstood poor souls, and of course children have no rights to safety just as they have no right to live if they are pre-born or even almost born.. Ah yes, the other extreme is so wise and humanitarian... all we really have to do to gain world peace is to sit back and wait for some enlightened peaceful countries to finally annihilate Israel, and all will be well under the sun.. and we can give prime seats to said countries in the U.N. and more of them on the human rights commission, then let the U.N. turn into a benevolent big brother who has programs for every thing in life, so they control every thing *in* life.. then we can witness for ourselves (or our kids and grand kids will) just how wonderfully kind hearted humanity has become and evolved to..
@CarlyLaine (759)
• United States
4 Apr 07
Thanks flowerchilde. Sympathies nah..really I knew what I was getting in to asking this question.
I read hard what you are saying...
We will stand firm and we will fight. There is nothing wrong with fighting for our beliefs and principles. But the LEFT sure does like to put us down for it.
Don't buckle and stand TOUGH, huh?
Thanks for your comments.
1 person likes this
@gewcew23 (8007)
• United States
5 Jun 07
I love to hear from fellow ditto heads. The only problem is Rush won't run from president because he would have to take a pay cut, and wouldn't be able to do what he loves the most. Rush loves radio. It's what he has always done. I do believe he would make a wonderful president. I am a new listener to his radio show, but my husband is a Rush baby. He got me hooked onto Rush, and now I am proud to call myself a ditto head.
@CarlyLaine (759)
• United States
5 Jun 07
GEWCEW
So glad that a fellow ditthead dropped a line. All debates would be over if Rush would run. That 80% chance that -as we sit right now- Hillary will be the next almost sickens me.
If Rush ran all of the other Republican candidates would throw in the towel. Rush would get it hands down. We need a Rush to run and there are no Rushes anywhere.
I am so happy that you responded. Married to a Rush baby. How sweet, huh? I have not ever known a Rush baby, so I am pretty thrilled.
I have been able to discern the Libs with higher understanding than before because of Rush. He's the best...no one can touch him. He's got a major following.
We were all brainwashed in grade school, middle school and high school. Thanks GOD there's our Rush.
1 person likes this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
12 Jun 07
I like Rush and used to listen to him everyday.
He is right most of the time and and does not play favorites when it comes to pointing out the stupidity and hypocrisy in our elected officials and celebrities as well.
Although he is conservative, he does not have a problem with nor will he hesitate to rake a republican over the coals when they deserve it.
I think that he would be a good president, but he is doing a greater service in what he does now.
The reason people don't like him is that he exposes the truth, and they don't want the truth to be known...or they don't want to acknowledge it.
As far as any flack, that is to be expected from the liberals who who think of conservatives as mean and evil.
1 person likes this
@onabreak2 (1161)
• United States
4 Apr 07
No and he would never run for president because #1. candidates for president have to debate people and Rush never debates anyone. He does all the talking and doesnt let anyone argue with him. I wont even go into his addiction to pain killers. He is a weak man. We dont want a weak man to be our president. Oh and he is a big hypocrit too. But if he is going to be president then why not have o'reilly for vice president
1 person likes this
@CarlyLaine (759)
• United States
4 Apr 07
Thank you so much for having the guts to show yourself. I do appreciate the time you took to formulate your response.
Rush is a great debater. He constantly challenges those who call into his radio show. He WILL NOT suffer stupidity from LIBs.
We've had several weak PRESIDENTS; they were LIBERALs. Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton...just to name a couple.
Now how interesting that YOU DON'T want a WEAK president. Yet, I know you hate Bush because he stands up to the Libs-at times. He does what needs to be done. I know there must protest in your heart for this president.
Mrs Clinton refuses to debate. How odd that you think that RUSH doesn't debate. Are you for Hill?
O'Reilly is to liberal for me.
If you have more--bring it on. I rather enjoy it. What about you?
2 people like this
@onabreak2 (1161)
• United States
5 Apr 07
He might debate people that call in to his show but he does not debate anyone in politics that appose his views. He would perhaps debate someone like me but not someone who really knows what they are talking about.
You hate the clintons so much because why?
1 person likes this
@CarlyLaine (759)
• United States
5 Apr 07
You obviously neglect to watch him on other TV News shows. He does debate. But he is not running..Hillary is but she is not debating.
She is given the pablum of her LIBERAL democrats. They aren't questioning that she is not debating....but you question RUSH who is not running-he loves debate so why wouldn't he do so?
There is really no reason for him to debate..if you listen to Pelosi, Hill, Reid any of them...they CONTRADICT themselves constantly. They can't keep a straight story or an honest story.
They can't debate...
1 person likes this
@ImmanentizeThis (25)
• United States
6 Jan 08
Heck no. People have to understand there is a difference between politics and punditry.
@gardengrrl (1445)
• United States
11 Jun 07
You'd be wasting your vote. Rush Limbaugh would be the Ralph Nader of the right wing - very smart, very accomplished, and completely unelectable. Thank God!
@CarlyLaine (759)
• United States
11 Jun 07
You have no idea what you are even writing about. Just attacking with no substance.
@CarlyLaine (759)
• United States
13 Jun 07
I do apologize for snapping that last comment out. You are correct. But I really do want some heat here.
This really is a war between ideologies. You have been brainwashed into lies and I believe that the right is correct on issues at hand.
You guys can't get one dang thought together, yet you all spout the same rhetoric. You lambast Rush and you probably don't even listen to him. You are not paying attention to what the left is really doing. If you are paying attention you want to destroy America-hence the war.
I think that left-hanging-wingers are ridiculous because they are not listening to themselves, each other or the right.
I won't even pretend that the right is innocent in double speak, but the left rules in this area...heck just listen to some of the crap of John Kerry. He almost became President...you don't listen-you are mezmerized by lies..
@gardengrrl (1445)
• United States
13 Jun 07
If all you want is to hear your fellow knee-jerk rabid right wing purveyors of bulls hit, why don't you put a big headline on your discussion, ONLY RIGHT WING TINYMINDS NEED REPLY?
I have no idea on what basis you insult my intelligence, but I can tell from your utterly ignorant response to me that you're so far down the IQ scale, it's a wonder you can read this at all. It's a good thing that all you do is spout the last bit of right-wing stupidity you heard on the radio, because myLot's servers would crash in shock if you actually had an intelligent response to someone who disagrees with you.
I am perfectly capable of forming my own opinion, which you apparently lack the basic brainpower to do. Spread your hate to some other itsy-bitsy brains who regurgitate the the same stupid venom as you, I'm a bit too busy helping to save our Republic from this current wave of right-wing childish social retards!