9/11

I'm not sure one way or another, but I will say that I don't see where either side seems more or less likely to me. That probably says more than I could say by picking sides... I think that it is AS likely that the government (or someone even higher up) caused 9/11 purposefully in order to bring about certain results, ie taking more of our rights away (see: Patriot Act) as it is that terrorists did it. Problem/Reaction/Solution... We want do so something... We create a problem that causes people to react and then accept our solution, which was the original thing we wanted to do... Invisible manipulation routine widely used by governments. On the other hand, it coulda been terrorists. Hard to say. I'd rather not speculate - both possibilities paint an ugly picture of our world today.

I think Bush is a moron, butI think 9/11 happened just the way it wasshown in amature video on television for months afterwards. There ws no conspiracy within the American government. The buildings collapsed simply because steel buckles at a certain temperature, and the inside of those buildings reached that temp. Then the weight of the top floors landing on the lower ones simply collapsed them as well. Lets face it, They were never built to withstand a direct hit by a missile because Americans thought they were impervious to attack.

I think Bush is doing his best and I support him in his line of action HOWEVER, I do think this could have been avoided...

This was a threat known to the government years in advance. Clinton had several opertunities to get rid of bin laden but was too concerned with the legalities and our image in the world to do so. Bush was only in office 8 months before this happened. I'm sure something could have been done by him as well but again, he was the new kid on the block and still learning the ropres. He suddenly found himself facing the most serious situations this country has faced in decades as a new president. I think under the circumstances, he did what he could. A study was done by a very reputable group, The Carnegie Mellon group that showed 1 to 4 cell calls are made on an average flight. Can you imagine the monumental task it would be to fake all those phone calls on 9/11? To fool that many people into thinking they were talking to family? The so called " explosions" that were witnessed were nothing more than air being forced out of lower windows as the other floors began to collaps. The steal was weakend by the intense heat of burning furniture, carpet, walling and other materials allowing the building to collaps in the stacked fasion it did. This had the effect of making it look like a controlled collaps. Lest also not forget taht bin laden himself admitted to the attacks.

Oh yeah Bush definitely knew what was going on. Try reading the book "Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster". It gives a lot of evidence about the conspiracies. The author is David Icke. www.davidicke.com

I believe all the evidence should be looked at, no matter how right or left wing it may seem, everything should be taken with a grain of salt, I've seen numerous documentaries flat out blaming our government for these attacks, and telling us that we are slowly becoming a facist nation. In these times with all the different information were exposed to, it's important to try and form you own original opinions based on all the evidence, but evidence that is supported by hard fact. Facts such as, on 9/11 for the first time in history, our VP was put in charge of our air defense system, or that we were running drills eerily similar to the attacks on that same day. I do think our government at least had foreknowledge of these events, and I do also believe that we used these attacks as a pretext for war with Iraq, even though it was proven that they had no WMD's (another terrible mishap in itself) and they most likely had no ties to Al Qaeda. All we can do in this time is stay informed as we can and really question everything that is handed to us. Stay informed!