Who was the better bowler?

I don't agree wid u. Both of dem r equally gud but if i hv 2 opt 4 1, definitely vaas den, may b not wid d records, but definitely wid d devastation.....He's jus a threat 2 d batsmen.........gr8 2 watch him play man!!!!! But, as I said, he can't match BINGA dude coz .......................... B!NG@ R0CK$

Even though murlidharan has a good record and getting wickets at regular intervals, i am of the opinion that his bowling action has always been questionable. I still don't feel that he is bowling it correctly. There is also Malinga now who is chucking these days rather than bowling. But the toothless and spineless ICC cannot do anything against these erring cricketers because they are mostly interested in only money rather than improving the game.

New Zealand's decision, when they won the toss and batted,was, in my opinion, the correct one. he problem was that there was only one lone hand from Scott Styris. When someone scores a hundred and you manage only 219 then you have let him down. I doubt whether Stephen Fleming has ever had nightmares of a bowler he has o face, but if he did, that bowler would be Chaminda Vaas.He has dismissed him on the last four occasions that New Zealand have met Sri Lanka for a duck, in exactly the same manner - lbw. Chaminda Vaas was awarded the man of the match by the TV commentators and I'm sure Michael Holding and Ian Bishop voted for the fast bowler.And i also think that was the correct decision, purely because he grab the first 3 wickets of the kiwi innings. My answer is Chaminda Vass

i think gallen macgrath is the best bowler in the world.because their bowling length and line is very good and towards the wickets