Is the term "nappy" generally considered a racial slur?
@elizabethbathory (1132)
United States
April 13, 2007 6:46pm CST
Please, don't flame me, as I'm merely curious . . .
In light of the Don Imus incident, I have begun to wonder about the word "nappy." I looked it up in the dictionary (dictionary.com, to be precise) and it has the following:
nappy(3)
1. covered with nap; downy.
2. (of hair) kinky.
It doesn't indicate that it's a racially charged terminology. While I understand Imus used it in a hateful way, would it be wrong for a non-African-American to use it in general speech?
3 people like this
4 responses
@Drakhan (240)
• United States
15 Apr 07
In the 1800s and early 1900s, nappy was used to describe the kind of hair African American's have. It wasn't so much a racial slur as a aesthetic one. It was used to point out that African American features didn't measure up to the European standard of beauty. So, yes, it was a word that made blacks feel unattractive or second rate in that period. Some people think that created a sense of inferiority in American blacks. You'll notice that when the Rutger's players went on Oprah, none of them actually had nappy hair. Neither did Oprah. They all straighten their hair to avoid looking nappy headed. So, yeah, apparently old insults still resonate with people in modern times.
3 people like this
@elizabethbathory (1132)
• United States
15 Apr 07
Wow, Drakhan, awesome reply! That really puts it into perspective for me. Thank you!
1 person likes this
@Ayannali (63)
• United States
15 Apr 07
The word nappy is a term that is described for a very coarse type of hair..as per the definition "kinky". When I was growing up, there was s destinction between those who had "nappy" hair and those who had "good" hair. Good hair is that type that is easy to comb, smooth and style. Nappy is hard to comb and usually need some sort of chemical to make it managable. The reason that this is significant was that most of those with "good" hair was mixed with another race...implying that being fully "Black" is bad but being mixed or lighter is better.
I believe that the uproar was more of the phrase "nappy headed" and then of course the other word.
1 person likes this
@elizabethbathory (1132)
• United States
15 Apr 07
The opposite of "good" is "bad," so I can understand the negative connotations evoked by the term "nappy" if being used in that context.
1 person likes this
@Foxxee (3651)
• United States
14 Apr 07
It's not a racial slur, but I guess it could be used as one. It all depends on how you say it.
I call my daughter's hair nappy when she wakes up in the mornings. I tell her she has a nappy head.
Nothing racial about that.
I don't know how else you would use the word nappy, so I would watch how you use it.
@elizabethbathory (1132)
• United States
14 Apr 07
That's what I figured, Foxxee. I've used it myself, when my own hair is matted from wearing a hat (hat-head). But now I'm paranoid of offending others, so I'll probably just avoid it alltogether. Thanks for taking the time to reply.
@xfahctor (14118)
• Lancaster, New Hampshire
14 Apr 07
I always used it to mean, nasty, smelly, or dirty. I guess it's another term I have to discard from my vocabulary now. This along with "articulate". Remember a few months ago? the controversy on that one? Give it a few months and another one will become offensive. I guess the issue with Mr. Imus was the context he used it in, though I'm still not convinced it was a totaly racial slur.
@elizabethbathory (1132)
• United States
14 Apr 07
It's getting to the point where we are going to have to use sign language to communicate with one another. *laugh* While I understand that everyone has feelings, sometimes the whole PC thing seems to be getting out of control.
2 people like this