Charles Darwin's therory of evolution,? or the Biblical cosmology of Genesis?

I tend to lean towards Darwin's. It's just that there is a missing link in his theory that somehow make people hesitate. I know people don't like to accept that we are descendants of monkeys, but if all animals we know these days are descendants of something else in the prehistoric era. I really don't see why is it impossible that we are descendants of some prehistoric living beings too? The Bible did say God created the universe then animals, plants etc before He created Adam. Is it not possible Adam was created as monkey that then evolved to be human? The Bible did say the creation took 7 days. Seven of God's days, can be seven of our years, or even 7 million years. Does God define one day as 24 hours? No. We do.

i'm also confuse with those theories. but i think only God created the Big Bang.what's your opinion?

I still believe on science, the big bang, the evolutionary process, not the biblical explanantion because it really lacks of information. But still, iM open to the idea that someones greater power involves in the process of creation but not God in the Bible.

Darwin's general theory that all life on earth had originated and evolved by a gradual successive accumulation of fortuitous mutations, is still is , as it was in Darwin's time, a highly speculative hypothesis entirely without direct factual support and very far from that self-evident axiom some of its more agressive advocates would have us believe. Very few have actually read The Origin of the Specie from cover to cover-and admittedly,to most it is a very tedious book. Darwin himself called it " one long argument". Darwin was a dedicated naturalist and loaded the book with numerous observations from the natural world in an attempt to convinced his readers of his assumptions. Yet,he himself confessed in his book that he did not have any direct evidence for his theory, only analogies and possible examples from nature. If the theory of evolution is a sure thing, why have so many doubts been raised against it? Why do so many fight so hard to prevent alternatives from being seriously considered? Most important of all, what does the evidence really show? Why not just present the concrete evidence as in any scientific theory? Because Darwin's theory is not just another scientific theory but a philosophical vieupoint-and, for many, a belief system.

If man evolved from apes there would be no apes today.The theory of evolution stinks. To begin with, there's nothing in this world that is ugly evolve to be beautiful.The moment we were born, we all start to decay eventually, and so does everything else. The story of creation would be more plausible.You can see the signature of God on all the things around you.From the lowliest form of life to the most complex, the hand of God is obvious. Nothing came by chance,everything has a purpose designed by a creator.

I tend to believe something that falls somewhere in the middle of the road. I believe a higher power was responsible for the machinations of what we have come to understand as evolution. I'm sure some folks won't like that, but it's how I feel.