Evolution Exposed!
@Chiang_Mai_boy (3882)
Thailand
6 responses
@0Impact0 (69)
• United States
28 May 07
I hope this website is a highly satirical joke. An entire section based on the "Theory of Gravity" and how it is all a fraud, give me a break, it's utterly insane. Why can people not accept that religion and science can co-exist on this topic. Evolution happened, there is fossil records. Some where along the line, God breathed life into the scum of the Earth, and it became man. The seven days in Genesis could have been 100 billion years, it is an objective point of view. After all how could the days be judged before the sun and moon existed? It's all one theory and no one understands that, why?
2 people like this
@Chiang_Mai_boy (3882)
• Thailand
6 Jun 07
While an individual fossil is not proof of evolution the entire fossil record supported by genomics makes the process of evolution an indisputable fact.
2 people like this
@leavert65 (1018)
• Puerto Rico
6 Jun 07
It's already being disputed so obviously it can't be "indisputable"
1 person likes this
@wifeofharvey (1156)
• United States
27 May 07
But they will, dispute them I mean. A great many people will simply dismiss them, others will strive to 'dis-prove' them. The reason for this is simple, to accept that evolution does not exist is to admit, in some way or another, to the fact of creation! That is the fact that is so intolerable to so many, to acknowledge that there is a being of intelligence 'out there'. That would mean something that is more intelligent than man, their ego's won't stand for it.
2 people like this
@tumalty1980 (256)
•
25 Jul 07
When will people understand religion and science can co exist. Religion is the blind belief in something which can not be proved or dis proved. Science can be proved with facts
The theory of a big bang creation is nonsensicle. for this to be beleived you must dis beleive in the existance of dianosors as before man or the big bang creation there was nothing????
Dino's did exist FACT therefore the bigbang creation of man did not happen. Evolution is a fact with undisputable evidence to prove it.
@Chiang_Mai_boy (3882)
• Thailand
26 Jul 07
The Big Bang is a theory that attempts to explain the origin of the universe, it has nothing to do with the creation or origin of man.
@urbandekay (18278)
•
17 Jun 07
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Well, I'm just holding my breath waiting for all the bridges to collapse, planes to drop out of the sky, etc!
Brilliant hokum, did they get kids to write it?
all the best urban
2 people like this
@LightninStrike (5915)
• Saint Vincent And The Grenadines
20 Jun 07
You have the right to believe all you want, but those facts in that link are ridiculous...they wouldn't resist a minimally serious scientific test. If you just want to believe that god created Adam and Eve and all that, it's great...but trying to expose a theory like Evolution one with such arguments is hilarious in my humble opinion.
@DesigningLife (903)
• United States
6 Jun 07
Well, I have just been told (in another thread) that god "Created" all life in such a way so that it could "Evolve" later.
I think I have a permanent 'tic' from shaking my head back and forth in disbelief...
...anyway, I had to look twice at your post Chiang - it's very late here and I could not believe you had posted something so contrary to your established position. LOL! Thanks for sharing.
2 people like this
@onedollar (781)
• Belgium
17 Jun 07
Even the Catholic church acknowledges the theory of evolution.
Creationism is not supported by any real scientist on the planet that says enough.
Of course if you take the bible litterally (which is nonsense of course since it was written with the mindset of people thousands of years ago + put together from various sources, pieces have been trown out, rewritten, badly translated and so on...) of course you can't be in favor of evolution.
Fact is we share 95% of our DNA with Chimps which means we are more related to chimps than chimps with gorilla's.
That a fact that can be proven and repeated time after time.
If we trust DNA enough to put someone behind bars, it's good enough to trust there is a connection with primates and humans.
Creationism or intelligent design as it is called now is a laughable thing not worth our time
@leavert65 (1018)
• Puerto Rico
18 Jun 07
4) Humans also share 75% DNA of a nematode (worm) 25% with a daffodil
5) The connection with primates and humans would be they share a common designer
6) The origin of the genetic coded information in DNA can only come from an
intelligent source. Information CANNOT, HAS NEVER come from naturalistic causes
Darwinian Evolution has no answer. That's laughable.
1 person likes this
@urbandekay (18278)
•
18 Jun 07
What constitutes a real scientist? It is an interesting question but the wrong one! Since we do not accept what scientists say because they are scientists, as if they speak with authority but because of the validity of the arguments and strength of the evidence they cite.
So, a better question might be; what criteria should we employ in giving or withholding credence from a piece of scientific writing?
Well, given that not everyone has sufficient background knowledge or skill to sift and weigh the arguments and evidence presented for themselves still there is one method they can employ.
Findings of the worldwide scientific community are published in professional journals, where they are subject to criticism from fellow scientists, philosophers and the like. It is facing this gauntlet peer review that provides credibility to a piece of academic research, for errors in reasoning and unsound conclusions, along with errors in experimental technique will quickly be pointed out.
Furthermore, other scientists will then test their findings by attempting to repeat them and this criteria of repeatability provides another layer of safeguard.
Thus, we should regard 'scientific' papers published outside of the professional journals as being highly dubious.
all the best urban
1 person likes this
@DesigningLife (903)
• United States
18 Jun 07
Can I ask a question here...sorry, I am not a scientist and have to look things up to the best of my ability, but it is my understanding that humans are a half a chromosome away from a monkey (please correct me if I have gathered the wrong information), so anyway, my question is this...since god supposedly "made us in his image", does that mean he was more similar to a very primitive monkey-like creature? If so, haven't we already surpassed his own intelligence through our own evolution? OR, does "in his image" really mean, "in his imagination"? If so, why would an omnipotent being need to imagine, desire, want, or need anything?
