Who's best; Federer or Nadal?

Norway
May 28, 2007 2:52am CST
Which one is the best tennis player? What do you think?
9 responses
• India
3 Jul 07
Its Nadal only. See how young he is and still "The King" Federer consequtively failing to beat him in Clay.... Expect the nightmare. Nadal is going to trouce down Federer for claiming his first Major Grass Court Crown... Cheers.......... Go go NADAL..............
• India
25 Jun 07
There is no doubt that federer is the best.He is more dominant and also consistent against every player he has played.But his win-loss ratio against nadal makes us to think over the supremacy between these two,though it is awell known fact that most of the loss for federer was at clay.federer is the undisputed king of grass and the spanish dude is the terror at roland garros.Both have their unique style which suits them in their favourite courts.To conclude i will say that fedex is the best for his consistency against other players compared to nadal
• Saint Vincent And The Grenadines
10 Jun 07
Right now Federer is a step over Nadal, and Nadal 3 steps over the rest. Both are way over the rest, but Federer is more balanced in all surfaced, whereas Nadal is better in clay but not as good as Federer in faster courts. Anyway Nadal has already beaten Federer in fast courts and he's younger, so who nkows what the future will bring. We will have to wait, but up to the present moment, Federer is better.
@pradoz (404)
• India
10 Jun 07
Nadal is powerful only on clay...and he is playing so well because of his physical strength and stamina....on the technical front Federer is so far above Nadal,that i don't think he is aserious threat to federer's supremacy
• Singapore
11 Jun 07
I think both of them are great players and they both have their own distinctive style of playing. It's pretty obvious that Nadal plays using brute strength.However, Federer plays a game with much more control and precision. I'm not saying that neither players lack in the other areas but that is the very contrasting stlye of play between the 2 of them. Recently, Nadal just won the French Open against Federer BUT it does not have ANY effect on the fact that Federer IS still the #1.Although Nadal is currently on an unbeaten winning streak on the clay court, Federer still reigns supreme in the other courts such as the grass and hard courts. Although the Roland Garros title is still the title that has still yet eluded him, i don't think that it would deter him from winning the rest of the grand slams. As a matter of fact, i think Federer hadn't played his best game YET...When that time do come, which i happen to think is somewhere in the near present, he will be INVINCIBLE!!! haha.quite dramatic towards the end lah.but that just show how strongly i feel about this.
@mike2003 (287)
• Philippines
17 Jun 07
Roger..... Rafa is the best in clay but if you're asking for all time, it's definitely Roger.. I mean, he is great in all surfaces and he is I think the second-best player on clay...It's just unfortunate he was up against the best player on clay probably for all-time...But look for him to bounce back the next three years.
@Sir_bobby88 (8231)
• Singapore
10 Jun 07
OF course it gonna be Rafael Nadal !!!!he rocks and he gonna take the french open
@Phlamingho (7824)
• Denmark
28 May 07
It dosen't matter what I think, just look at the stats. Federer is way better ;-)
@randy88 (683)
• Indonesia
31 May 07
federer is better I think he can play on all courts, but Nadal only good on clay