Do you think the Apocrypha is part of the Bible?

I'll definitely check out the website, If you could list some would be appreciated that not only me but others might check. The quote before the Bible existed you surely meant the New Testament part right? These quotes that you mean could you give one with scripture verse No. so I can examine it. thanks for your response

I check this website and it is very educational and I'll be going over it for a long time, and that's why I admire discussions such as these because I always keep my mind open because you never know when your learning can be increased if you'll allow it and also keep sharp in rightly dividing truth, thank you for the info and Shalom

The letters that you speak of claiming to be scripture. Can you speak of any that are checkable and if the decision was left up to One man how certain is that decision if we haven't originals? I know I haven't the know how to read the original print but some one could surely. As for the Maccabees when it comes to reading the history and comparing it I find it pretty well written but even in that since it still had to be translated by someone right LOL. great discussion Shalom

In Jude 1:14 It speaks of Enoch prophesying of ten thousand of saints returning to earth but it's not in the Old testament but there is a book of Enoch not part of this days translation, could this answer Jude 1:14? Many scriptures in the Bible we except has contradictions so would this eliminate it under this principle one is Acts 9:7 and Acts. 22:9 First the brethren with Paul heard the voice and the other says they didn't which is it? thanks for the response

I agree that there are more because too many places in the Old testament speaks of these books, one just off the top was Assur, and the book of Kings, many times it would say cannot these be seen in the book of so and so, The website that the party just before you give, has all these writings your speaking of on it, and I can't wait to spend some time there but your info bears light on the subject, now knowing this that the focus is on those that took lead in putting this together should it be more sharing to show maybe verified original copies to the world that has a desire to know?

I surely understand what your saying but lets take for example acts 9:7 (Paul writing) And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless,( hearing a voice but seeing no man). compared to Acts 22:9 And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid;( but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me). Now if Paul wrote this and that's the claim of so many, how could he make this mistake and one speaks as not the subject but the writer, besides they are totally opposite and only one can be right. now if errors of this kind are here, what other errors that we can't check without the original script. So its hard to say about the Apophryca but the different thoughts are great to hear, thank you for your response Shalom