Bring Back the "Good Wars"... not these Evil Wars like Iraq!
By ParaTed2k
@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
September 15, 2007 2:20pm CST
I wonder if the left would accept us fighting the war in Iraq like we fought in WWII, to bring it to an end.
Should we carpet bomb cities to take out factories? Should we torture (not just tantamount to torture, but REALLY torture prisoners to get them to talk? Should we lock up all Muslims in America "just in case"? Should we hold all prisoners in camps until the end of the war plus six months?
What about on the homefront, we are whining about gas prices, but shouldn't gas, sugar, rubber, steel, coal and other necesities or the war effort be rationed? Shouldn't we convert be converting all the factories we have left to producing items needed to fight the war? Shouldn't we be looking at any young man 18-25 who is not in uniform with contempt and distrust? Shouldn't we be putting our life savings into war bonds?
yeah! Let's fight this war the way "the good wars" were fought!
4 people like this
6 responses
@cblackink (969)
• United States
17 Sep 07
I think, first of all, that this is a war that we should never have been involved in in the first place. The real war should be fought in Afghanistan and Pakistan, not Iraq. This is GW junior's decision to finish GW senior's war with Saddam Hussein. A vendetta, pure and simple. Meanwhile, the real war looms...
This is not so simple and clean cut like WWII. This is a guerrilla war with a holy war twist. These people are patient, unlike us with our "instant gratification" mentality. They will fight as long as they have to.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Sep 07
Arguments about why it started are all acedemic now. The war in Iraq isn't the same as it was then.
Iraq isn't an exception to the war on Islamist Terrorism, it is the Epicenter of it. Bush Sr. made the fatal mistake of accepting a ceasefire, which he never should have done.
Unconditional surrender is the only real end to war. The second Bush Sr. was suckered into that ceasefire, future presidents were doomed to finishing the job.
@4ftfingers (1310)
•
17 Sep 07
I agree we should have never got involved. In the eyes of the terrorists, we are no better than how we see them. We may have democratic nations, but how can we convince them that is what we want for them with our tract record. They think the US is there to control, just as Britain had done for years before. They will never accept us, and no war will change that.
I did agree with the Afghan war, but every single thing we do just gives them more insentive to fight back, cause more terrorism so if this war is meant to erradicate terrorism it will never work. More and more young Muslim men want to join the fight against us every day, influenced by their clerics and parents and teachers to make sure we don't take control of their land.
1 person likes this
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
17 Sep 07
That is why we must be prepared to fight them for as long as it takes to defeat them.
1 person likes this
@4ftfingers (1310)
•
15 Sep 07
It would be easier if this war was as clear cut as the second world war and we did know who the enemy and the sympathisers were. Instead these snakes crawl among us and try to attack us when we don't expect it.
At least in world war 2 most of our men stuck to the rules. I get such a strong sense of pride when I read about how professional our men were in the war.
And the idea that on the eve of Christmas of the first war Britsh and German soldiers were able to drop arms and play a game of soccer is incomprehendable if we try to place that in the war we have ourselves involved in now.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
16 Sep 07
Yeah, well, it has been a long time since we have even trained for "Front line" conventional warfare. It really is a thing of the past.
Don't be so quick to paint all our troops with such a broad brush. Yes, some of our troops have done some horrendous things that go far beyond the bounds of war, but when they have been caught, they have been tried for their crimes.
That should speak volumes for us as a nation, unfortunately the incompetent press chooses to show their total bigotry here. Instead of using it as an example of how the system still works, they act as if every (or even a huge number) troop is just waiting for their chance to rape and pillage.
The thing that makes me the most sick is, when the enemy does it, the same press and people make excuses for it... forgetting completely that not only did the individuals commit these crimes, but video taped them, and bragged about them.
So, remember that while not all our guys are as honorable as we'd like to think, to the enemy horrendous acts are career enhancers.
1 person likes this
@4ftfingers (1310)
•
16 Sep 07
Oh yeh, sorry that's not what I meant but I see how what I said seems like that.
I was drawing comparison with the way the Islamic Fundamentalists fight and how the Nazi Germans fought. I may be wrong because I wasn't there but at the risk of sounding neive or ignorant the way we are tought about the war makes it sound that both sides, even the Germans, fought with some credibility. Not all, ofcourse the higher ranking Nazis were terrible people.
But just like ours, their soldiers were good people, just caught in the next attempt to build an Empire at the time.
When we look at what we are up against now, they don't seem to fight with such dignity. Bombing cities and planes and trains packed with innocent people that have welcomed them into their societies - handed out benefits to them and their families. These people are vermin and bring shame on Islam and the billions of other decent people who follow it.
Our men have done some terrible things but 99% of them are decent people and like you said it would be wrong to paint them all with the same brush.
With regards for the ones that have done bad things like making the detainees pose for pictures and so on, I don't make excuses for their actions but it's so easy for anyone who has never been in their postition to condemn their actions. War is a terrible place that only I can imagine - it's bound to make people do things they wouldn't normally do.
Despite whatever I think about the powers that took us to Iraq and the decisions they have made, I would never speak bad against our brave troops that serve out there, and have served us in the past. I know nothing about what they have to experience so I wouldn't have any right to.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Sep 07
Yup, back in the "good wars" bombing cities wasn't considered a crime, it was expected. The general policy for bombing a single factory was start dropping bombs 100 yards before the factory and quit 100 yards after the bomber cleared the factory.
@MrNiceGuy (4141)
• United States
21 Sep 07
You are talking about a term called "total war" which is probably overkill for Iraq, would be massively expensive, and would be much more devastating to the parties involved.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
21 Sep 07
To paraphrase Mr. Miyagi in Karate Kid...
"Either you war do "yes" or war do "no." You war do "guess so," SQUICH... "just like grape. Understand?"
The other side is fighting a total war...
@Destiny007 (5805)
• United States
16 Sep 07
It sounds like a winner to me.
When gunfire erupts from within a crowd, or the gunmen run into the crowd in order to escape, the crowd then becomes rabble and should be treated as such.
Under the Geneva Convention rabble can be shot and someone with the rank of Corporal or greater can give the command.
This is much preferable than the witch hunts that have been occurring when so-called innocent civilians have been killed by our troops.
You can bet it wouldn't take long before the crowds would be unwilling to hide these individuals, and the crowds would tend to disperse very quickly when they knew the bullets were about to start flying.
Of course people were b1tching about that president then also.
The president has to do what he believes to be the best thing for our country. Presidents lead, and don't generally listen much to what the people say...if they did they never would get anything done.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Sep 07
Exactly, leadership has nothing to do with figuring out the popular thing and doing it... In fact, there is NO leadership in the kind of person who does so.
@revdauphinee (5703)
• United States
16 Sep 07
this war is no different form your so called good wars (there is no such thing as a good war)in ww2 Hiltler and the natzis wanted to rule the world in this one Islam wants to do the same where is the difference except that we are decived as to why we are fighting it by GW aND HIS CRONIES!
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Sep 07
So we should have just allowed Hitler to carry out his goals?
1 person likes this
@revdauphinee (5703)
• United States
16 Sep 07
then you are wrong for the holy Jihad is in order to obtain a muslim world and it has nothing to do with iraq it is what mulims aRE TAUGHT TO DESIRE AND AIM FOR
1 person likes this
@worldwise1 (14885)
• United States
16 Sep 07
You lost me, Para, when you used the phrase "Good Wars." In my opinion there are no good wars. We are living in different times from when rationing, etc. had to be used. I don't say that it will never come to that, but I hope this war is over before that has to happen.
2 people like this
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Sep 07
War is like any other innannimate thing. War is niether good nor bad, it just is.
Was the U.S. Revolutoinary war a good thing? 2/3 or the colonists didn't think so... but a lot of us are glad it happened. Was WWII a good thing? Ask the people who aren't living under Nazi tyrrany.
People say "peace" is a good thing too. Is it? Nope, just like war, it is neither good nor bad. There is no war in our worst ghettos, but is there peace?
I repect anyone's right to be a pacifist, but every pacifist needs to accept the fact that they enjoy that right because someone else is willing to defend it for them.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
17 Sep 07
Oh, I know what's going on in the ghettos of this nation. I ran ambulance in Atlanta and Milwaukee.
Yes, there are shootings and the occasional bombings, but my point is, there is no "war" there, only crime... but is there "peace"?