What do you like in Linux?
By httpx0
@httpx0 (302)
France
December 5, 2007 12:34pm CST
I like the design and it's stability, and I aslo like Linux (I use Mandriva) because you can modify the system and it's free. In addition, I've noticed that people who use Linux are friendly and are good in computer, so we can have nice discussions.
What about you? Why do you like Linux? What do you like the more in Linux?
2 people like this
4 responses
@jiffys_frog_woman (4050)
• United States
5 Dec 07
i use freespire linux but i miss windows but i have not had any problems with linux so far
2 people like this
@httpx0 (302)
• France
5 Dec 07
Hey jiffys_frog_woman :)
If you miss windows, remember that you can install it and keep Linux too. It's called a dual boot I think (I'm not sure) but I'm using this and that's very good because sometimes I want to go on Windows and sometimes I want to go on Mandriva so I think the best thing is too keep both :)
Good day !
1 person likes this
@thundercat (505)
• United States
5 Dec 07
Linux can be a much more stable system than Windows for most uses. The only draw back is the fact that you cannot get all the software that you use in Windows for Linux, though there are quite a few alternatives.
With regards to being able to modify the system and getting the operating system for free, most Linux distributions are the same, with the exception of ones such as Red Hat which you are actually paying for the support for.
I personally dual boot Ubuntu and Windows XP, though for most of the work I do I mostly use Windows. Ideally I would like one computer running Windows and possibly a laptop running Linux, so that I could have the best of both worlds without having to reboot to switch the OS.
2 people like this
@CraftyCorner (5600)
• United States
5 Dec 07
I like Linux because I can open my email with out worrying that I am going to open a virus. I've even gotten the things from my friends. The same goes with web pages. Linux also has a stability that is boss. Dapper Drake 6.6 doesn't have programs hanging there for minutes and rarely freezes on my system like Windows does.
@santuccie (3384)
• United States
6 Dec 07
There are Linux Trojans out there, and Linux boxes in botnets. In fact, eBay says they've seen MORE rootkitted Linux boxes than Windows machines: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/03/ebay_paypal_online_banking/
Rootkits are designed to hide the presence of malware. Couple that with the fact that most Linux users don't use antimalware software, and you have a relatively easy mark...if you can find an exploitable vulnerability. Since we seem to be of an understanding that most cybercriminals use Linux, I can see that being feasible.
I won't say these Linux boxes were infected in drive-by attacks; that's unlikely, just as it is with Windows Vista. In order to access the kernel, you need root/administrator permissions in either. No, it's probably just the good, old social engineering tactic, such as an e-mail attachment from a friend.
Linux Mint is my OS of choice for everyday use, a descendant of Ubuntu. I believe in the inherent security of Linux, but I still observe some safety practices: 1) I use NoScript, and I don't authorize anything I'm not familiar with. 2) I install software ONLY from the repositories; no .tar.gz, no .rpm, no opening a terminal to install stuff. 3) When I get an e-mail with an attachment, no matter who it's from, no matter what OS I'm running, I save it on the desktop first, then scan it at VirusTotal BEFORE opening it. If so much as ONE scanner returns a positive result, I junk the copy on my desktop, and hold onto the e-mail for a week. By then, just about everyone should have updated their signatures, and more scanners will come back positive if it really is infected.
Just for conversation, here's how I fortify Windows: http://invincible-windows.blogspot.com/
Hope this helps!
1 person likes this
@santuccie (3384)
• United States
6 Dec 07
I like Linux because it is free and fast. I also like the fact that you don't have to defragment the hard drive, nor keep track of what programs need updates. It's all done for you.
I use Linux Mint 4.0 Daryna. It's dual-booted with Windows XP Pro Corp., for those occasional projects that Linux software can't facilitate. I keep Windows' kernel locked down, preventing malware from launching, so I have no need for antivirus and antispyware (all I have is a firewall). Just restrict creator/owner permissions like Linux does, and Windows is equally secure: http://invincible-windows.blogspot.com/
Personally, I feel that Windows is more stable than Linux. Windows will not lock up without a reason. It doesn't have problems with USB like Linux does (a USB mouse will frequently freeze in Linux). I've also had Ubuntu and Mandriva hang during shutdowns after a USB crash; after doing a hard shutdown on one particular occasion with Ubuntu, several files on my external hard drive were gone.
The only things that make Windows crash IMO are third-party bloatware, software/hardware incompatibility issues, damaged hardware, malware infections, registry problems, and corrupt drivers. User error covers a lot of this, but it's tough to put a finger on (and most people find it easier to blame everything on MS anyway). You have issues with Microsoft Updates once in a blue moon, but that's just one more reason to use drive imaging software. Then of course there's Windows Me. I have no excuses for Windows Me; it was a flop. But at least the market reflects it (98 has a greater market share than Me)
Nevertheless, even without antivirus and antispyware, and with unnecessary services disabled, and with the registry cleaned, and with temp files cleaned, and with the hard drive defragmented...Windows XP cannot hope to outrun Linux, and it gets slower the longer you leave it on. Linux can be left running for months and even years, and still not show performance degradation. It runs fast! And as long as the pointing device isn't USB, it keeps on running...fast. That's why Linux is my OS of choice for normal use. Salute!
-santuccie
P.S.: Laughing at dumb jokes is still good for your health!!!
1 person likes this
@santuccie (3384)
• United States
7 Dec 07
Yah, like I said, that's what I don't like about Windows. It's slow from the gate, and keeps getting slower. The only way to speed it up is to empty out all the temp files and reboot periodically. Windows 2000 is okay, and I have a friend who specifically wanted to be able to use his computer on the fly, without ever having to turn it off. I put 2K on his machine, and he's been as happy as could be ever since. I understand that Windows 7 will have a stripped-down core; hopefully they'll be able to shake the nickname, "Windoze."
I fixed my crashing problem in Linux by using a USB = PS/2 mouse. Unfortunately, I have a lot of USB storage devices, including a 40 GB hard drive and several flashdrives. I have one 2 GB flashdrive that stores my Thunderbird Portable e-mail client and private files; this is my most important USB device, and I keep backups. It will occasionally go read-only in Linux, and I'll have to reboot before Thunderbird starts downloading messages again. Almost every distro I've tried has this same problem with USB, including Mandriva, Ubuntu, Xubuntu, and Linux Mint. The only one that seemed totally stable was OpenSuSE. But I didn't use it for more than a day, because it was too difficult to me to use. It was the only distro I never managed to get online with.
I've been in contact with Clement Lefebvre, the lead developer of Linux Mint, and he tells me he's never been able to put a finger on the problem. He suggested I turn off USB Legacy Support in the BIOS (unfortunately, my keyboard is USB, so I can't do that), and not use too many USB devices at once; Linux just can't handle it. But once again, the pros outweigh the cons IMO. A simple reboot once a day in Linux Mint hardly counterbalances its speed advantage over Windows XP, and especially over Vista. Salute!
@santuccie (3384)
• United States
7 Dec 07
Sorry, I made a typo. I meant to say that I'm using a USB = PS/2 adapter for the mouse.
@httpx0 (302)
• France
6 Dec 07
Thank you for the response! I use Mandriva One (2008), dual-booted with Windows Vista because I'm having problem on how to configurate my internet connection (wifi) on Mandriva, and because there are some programs that aren't availables for Linux, and games too.
But I don't feel that Windows is more satble than Linux because I've formated my computer one week ago and Vista is already lagging, even if I've installed Zone Alarm (Firewall), Kaspersky (Antivirus) and Avast! (another french antivirus).
And I don't have problems with USB for the moments... Well I only have a wifi mouse (Microsoft) because I have a laptop and I have a webcam, a mouse and a keyword integrated.
So for the moment, I find Mandriva One more stable than Windows Vista but I'm thinking of moving on Ubuntu to resolve my internet problem!
Good day :)
httpx
2 people like this