My Idea for a perfect Survivor Season
@doubleloveyou (2466)
United States
December 18, 2007 11:02pm CST
I would love to see them start the show off in a cluster of islands where each person has their own island. They start of with trying to win individual immunity. Then EVERYone comes together for the first tribal counsel. Then they split the group into 3 tribes of 5 people each. Every 3 days the 2 tribes that do not win immunity have to go to tribal and vote one person out. After each tribal those 2 teams are mixed up randomly. That way you never know where your alliance will end up. It also makes it to where a dominant team of 5 won't just run away with the entire show. That would really change up the game to the point where no one would know what to do next. What do you all think?
3 people like this
5 responses
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
19 Dec 07
Wow you really thought this out! I like the idea of constant mix ups b/c it means that the team that wins gets the advantage of keeping alliances, while the other two have to work harder at it.
I liked how on this season they got to "steal" a team member whenever they won, which is how James got the immunity idols. Anything to mix it up or change teammates would make it much more interesting.
2 people like this
@vivasuzi (4127)
• United States
19 Dec 07
Or another random idea would be that once they merge, the person who wins immunity cannot vote. Maybe that would mix it up b/c then people would want immunity but also not want it b/c it cancels out their vote! I don't know why I thought of that, I just want to change things up next season.
2 people like this
@doubleloveyou (2466)
• United States
19 Dec 07
I like that one too. Or even going back to Exile Island theme, but instead of the winning team sending someone from the loosing team to exile Island, after each immunity challange each person on the winning team draws a stone. Who ever gets the "special" stone must pick someone from their own team to go to Exile Island. That person cannot be voted off AND they cannot vote for anyone. That would help people see where the alliances really are.
If anyone can figure who to send a message to mark burnett let me know. The way i see it is they let people be on the show, but what about letting us who love the show but can't be on give some suggestions for the show or for competitions etc. Just a thought.
2 people like this
@mflower2053 (3223)
• United States
20 Dec 07
Something needs to be done to change it up. I watched the first season and started to watch the second until I seen the samething was happening. They do need to do something like that so they wouldn't have a chance at making alliances.
2 people like this
@doubleloveyou (2466)
• United States
21 Dec 07
If you have only seen the 1st and part of the second then you need to see the rest because there have been a LOT of twist and turns.
1 person likes this
@LouiseKnittel (4764)
• United States
26 Sep 08
they really have done a lot of different things.. they have changed it up so many ways now. One season they started off with 3 teams.. They have had Mean against woman.. Young people against Older ones. Now someone get voted off the to another are to look for a immunity Idol. It is not always the same. I hope you try it again soon!
@groomtobe23 (635)
• United States
19 Dec 07
Well it certainly would be interesting to see how people decide who to vote off at that first council then. Do you even see the others before it? With this strike it may be a possible idea. :)
@doubleloveyou (2466)
• United States
21 Dec 07
I would say that you just let them do the very first vote from what they learn about people at the tribal. You knowm like first impressions ONLY. Nothing else to go on. Each survivor gets to make one statement. That statement will either keep them on or get them voted off.
1 person likes this
@suspenseful (40193)
• Canada
26 Sep 08
Would that not be more expensive as they would need more camera men to film each individual? I would say one tribe to an island, so that they would not know what the others do, and you can see how hard they really work when they think no one is about. It would make the season a little shorter though.
@doubleloveyou (2466)
• United States
26 Sep 08
Yes but only for the first 3 days. Besides, look at how much they are making off of the show. A change up like this would be so radically different that it would take both the players and the viewer by surprise. Oh how I love a good surprise in Survivor. 
1 person likes this
@panicdude (456)
• Philippines
19 Dec 07
that could work since most teams form alliance and the majority of those would like to vote off someone who they think is the strongest one or a threat to them winning the prize. maybe you should send this to the production staff of survivor. i think that they would give this a shot... a twist to a new season..
@doubleloveyou (2466)
• United States
19 Dec 07
Hey, with all the writers on strike they may actually take it. I wonder how I would do that? It woul be worth a try. lol. And you and I would know where they got the idea. :)
1 person likes this
