relationship b/w science and religion

You obveously have never read some of my religious responses and post. I bring reilgious writings into question all the time, or at least the excepted meanins of what the texts realy say, and I am a christian and I believe it's time for christians to realy read whats there beyond the deffanitions they been told. I question both science and religion to bring the two back to gether and they are not as far apart as some beleive inlight of the oragins of the bible and the hidden meanings of the stories that sound supernatural. But at the same time I don't exspect to make anyone believe what I say, everyone is intitled to their own beliefs and I respect yours as well. thanks.

But infact they are very related, The first scientis were in fact religious, and used faith to descover many new theories. They are alike becouse BOTH are "man made" as you say to determine the couses and actions of the phisical world. Even Enstine beleived in a universe of intellegent design. Both also make the practisioner use alittle faith in their theories when everything doesn't quite add up. Take the bigbang theory, It states that over a billion years ago everything that is in the universe was compressed into the size of an atom , and then it spontaiously began to exspand, and that all the matter in the universe has just always existed. This statemendt defies both the first and second laws of thermodynamics! So therefor takes to my oppenion even more faith to beleive than an intelligent being creating all that is in the Universe useing the constant exspansion theory stated in the bigbang theory. Thw Universe thus had a beginning in finite history and therefor according to the second law will someday end. Scientis bend phisical laws or just outright break them some times to mold the phisical universe into their mold, and scoff and laugh at religious people for seeing the universe following the laws of design? Yet the laws of thermodynamics match perfectly with creation, The first law simply in it's most understandable form to the general poulation says, You can not get something from nothing. Meaning you must have something to have something and the couse of change to make somthing is equil to the couse minus amount lost as a result done by the work by the system and its surounding. One then would see the falicy of the big bang taking the size and heat energy of the universe, the amount of work performed minus the loss, the universe would have been the big dud. The second law furthe states in everyday english that the natural state of matter is decay and winding down, not speeding up exspanding and new material being created as the big bang suggest in order to try to overcome the obveious violation of the firs law, they break the second law to try to explain the existance of matter in the universe. So obveously all the matter in the universe could not have always existed, becouse you can not #1 get something from nothing, and second all matter deteriorates not stays stable in an ever increaseing exspansion. So wich takes more faith to beleive? A theory that breaks the laws of phisics, or the belife that everything that is was created by one who has always been?

Well I think that religion bends a lot more rules than science. I grant that science sometimes gives wrong answers but at least there is a constant drive towards new information. If a different truth is discovered it is applied and becomes the norm as soon as possible. You can not really question the stories from religious texts because they all call upon your faith to believe and describe unnatural phenomena. How do you disprove something that doesn't exist? I do believe in "God" and was raised in a religious background but I no longer believe much of what organized religion has to offer. I do not believe they have my best interests at heart. The great thing about science though, is that we are always discovering new things, who knows, maybe someday the laws of physics will be different. The bible however will not likely change.

I believe science is like a scale with which we can measure the truth about a religion: a true religion will fulfill all aspecs of science and logic.

Yes both try to explain our phisical world, and science was born from religion, All sciences have their oragins in religion. It is a shame that today scientis believe that if one imbraces science they muust therefor reject religion and faith. It is not neccary to do so. Both can work together, it makes more sense than a theory put forth by science that breaks the laws of phisics inorder to make it work in a universe with no God.

That is open to interpretation also. The word Virgin in ancient times referred to the state of mind of a person. In the context of Mary, it was interpreted that she was pure in spirit, hence a virgin.

Considering this discussion relates to Science and Religion it perhaps is best to understand that it is physically impossible to bear a child without some form of physical intervention. Interpretation of the bible needs to be studied here to understand the context in which these words are spoken.

Truely said,there isn't anything impossible to God He can even creat a child while his mother is never being touched by a man.

sorry i dont understand what are baha'i can you please explain.regaring your comment i feel qiute agreed

really thta what Muslims believe as well,where then lies the difference?

The Baha'i Faith is a religion that believes all of the Prophets of the major world religions are from the same God and all of humanity is one race. For more general info you can check out www.bahai.us or if you have a specific question you can ask me.

yeah but a true scripture should have the quality of explaining or proving all the scientifical concepts and should not contrary them even if it differ for some time them it should bre proved laqter

Yes it not only explains our place but also the reason behind our creation, our purpose and way of life and what will happen when we will die.

Exactly. In fact religion is what explains the unexplainable, which in some cases is known as the unseen world.

yeah like heaven or hell,though not seen yet we can really feel what it would be like.

your thoughts show that you are an educated and open minded person

religion provides us with an idea and science is a way to prove that thought to be true or false and the authenticatiohn of the religion.a true religion will prove to be true by science and logic

your thinking is quite logical and unbiased.dont you think that science can be used as a scale to measure the truth about a areligion since their are several religions in the world.

the thing we now call as facts are something that has been origtinated from the beliefs of previoius peole

its still belief..book is made by those people.did they see heaven or hell.beliefs r all the things tht we dont see.science has proof..deals with facts.and ofcouse i respect if thts ur belief.