How many people get on MyLot just to argue?

United States
March 12, 2008 6:30pm CST
After looking over some discussions it seems as if some people are here just to start arguments are make people angry. As if they get a huge kick out of it and need something more to entertain their lives. A good debate is fine, but people who come on here looking to argue and make people angry, who attack personal stuff that has been said, shouldn't be allowed to stay on the site. It's not of benefit to other members and just ends up making a lot of people fuming. A penny for your thoughts?
6 people like this
14 responses
@Tetchie (2932)
• Australia
13 Mar 08
I certainly don't look for arguments on this forum though it has been my experience that some posters deserve a good talking to in regard to ignorant racist and religious comments that insight dissension among myLotters. At the moment some political discussions have innuendo that is totally unfounded and should not be left unaddressed. Personal attacks are for the less intelligent ones who cannot argue a discussion using knowledge and experience. For these people, it is best to ignore their comments and not buy into them. What you give energy to grows. If you feel that some posters are too aggressive and personal with their posts, report them to Admin. You learn allot through this forum, especially about human behavior - it's no different to real life.
1 person likes this
• United States
13 Mar 08
i LOVE to argue, and if the person im arguing with cant keep a cool head during the debate then thats their fault not mine. ive never gotten pissed off from a debate or argument and i expect the same out of my opponent, if they cant handle it like an adult then they shouldnt have gotten themselves involved in it in the first place. i dont come here JUST to argue, but its one of the sites main attractions for me. a good thrilling debate/argument makes my day.
@Tetchie (2932)
• Australia
13 Mar 08
Hey how come you got to use that pissed off word? I tried to use the short version of Richard in the context of every Tom *ick and Harry and got asked to rephrase my post. Hmmmm? Not that I'm peed off, just isn't this a double standard?
@Tetchie (2932)
• Australia
13 Mar 08
Well D!ck is a person's name, capital D in use. I though pissed off would be more aggressive. You might be right, they haven't got it on their list yet. Just making conversation really, cause there's no point arguing with Admin, you can't win. Nice talking to you.
• United States
13 Mar 08
well pissed off is different than d!ck, so its not so much a double standard as it is the moderators or admin or whoever feel that pissed off is acceptable and d!ck isnt, or someone simply forgot to add it to the list of words you cant say.
• Philippines
15 Mar 08
everyone has the right to express their thoughts and perceptions. but if its already below the belt..i think..thats not good anymore!
@speedy1279 (2665)
• United States
13 Mar 08
You know my first thought after I read your discussion was to make a smart comment. But I thought otherwise. Anyways, I agree with you it is ridiculus. I have bitten my tongue so many times on here that I am surprised it hasn't fallen off yet. Some people can be very rude and it is uncalled for. I have actually had people do this to me, but I just ignore them(as hard as that is) and most of the time they move on. I am not sure if anyone has actually gotten banned from here for personally attacking someone else, but I think they should implement it. Have a great day!
@Tetchie (2932)
• Australia
13 Mar 08
There is a line that must not be crossed, but I'm not sure just how testie myLot is. I think if someone incites hatred with intention then they are dealt with. But if everything was as nice as pie then this forum would be terribly boring. And at times it is really boring and hard to find discussions that are meaty.
• United States
13 Mar 08
I see your point. In my response I didn't mean that I wanted everyone to be nice and no debating. A good debate is always welcome with me as long as it is tasteful and they don't start personally attacking me. When it gets to personal attacks then I think it has gone to far and those people should be dealt with. I actually had a really good debate going on between another member on a discussion I had started. But neither one of us started personally attacking each other. In the end we ended up apologizing to each other for some things that we both misunderstood.
1 person likes this
@barehugs (8973)
• Canada
13 Mar 08
There's an olde saying, "It takes two to Argue," that I never forget, and the reason is, I've been married 52 years to the same woman.So having said that, May I choose to differ with you? I love a good argument and I never get upset no matter what! Imagine what myLot would be like if all the responders sided with the Posters, and no one took an opposite view!Its the opposite view that makes the post! If a person gets angry that's their problem. We live in a free country, and People are out there right now, putting their lives on the line, so we can keep that privilege. God Help America!
• United States
13 Mar 08
I don't believe you understood her. She didn't in know way mean she exspects everyone on here to agree and no one have a different opinion. She is talking about those that come on here and do nothing but cause trouble. They are very rude and make personal attacks on people. There is nothing wrong with having a good healthy debate/argument, but when people start name calling, personally attacking you, and are down right rude about it. Well then they have gone to far. That is what she is getting at.
1 person likes this
@theprogamer (10534)
• United States
13 Mar 08
Here's my take on it. Yes there are a few people who just seem to do nothing but argue, and sham, and insult, especially on certain subjects. However, there are people who really are debating, but some of the other members can't take it. Members like this cannot debate, or are so irritated someone is saying something different they'll either gather "friends" to counter/sham or they'll just hit you in the star rating (that's VERY easy to do around here... -_-)There are also members who are selective readers (i.e. they didn't read the response/discussion, they just read what they wanted and reacted to that. -_-) Also note this. That even the most argumentative people aren't always a detriment to a site. They too can be civil people when not debating. Members seem to forget this as well (or they ignore it). If someone is clearly being a constant disruption (post chasing, stalking, yelling, insulting... to incredible degree) then there should be action. However, if you or a friend have been in a scrimmage/debate with another member, why not find a bit more about them? You may find they aren't ogres or that only a couple of issues they feel very passionate about... but other than that they are amicable. This response maybe ignored (thanks star rating -_-... thanks odd deletions as of late...) but I still felt the need to post my piece here as a known debater... but also someone who's felt witchhunt involved in the discussion matter.
• United States
13 Mar 08
As I said in my original post there is nothing wrong with people who like to debate. However, there are some people who personally attack other people and that is not a good debate. That is a low way to get at someone who said something that the person didn't agree with.
1 person likes this
@theprogamer (10534)
• United States
16 Mar 08
"well you cant debate,lol" Try harder next time.
• United States
13 Mar 08
I hope not many do so. This just doesn't seem like a healthy or productive reason to be on a site in the first place.
@raijin (10345)
• Philippines
13 Mar 08
Some consider mylot as their own battleground[i][/i] here, they come here for an intellectual opinion and debates. They look at mylot as a form of media, to share something to other people from all walks of life and around the world. But this is where everything breaks down and resort into nasty arguments like those misinformations, disagreements and debating. I believe that this is not the right place to do those things, it's better to tackle it on public and in personal so points can be taken and credits are given to who deserves it. I didn't came to mylot for that purpose, I came here to share and contribute positive/helpful informations. Not to mention the people whom I've come to meet here came from different places, we both get the chance to exchange idea and opinions in a healthy manner.
@subha12 (18441)
• India
13 Mar 08
you are right. i have seen that many people are using it for various other purposes. I value that people should have different opinion. some are here just to argue with others. it is not right.
• United States
13 Mar 08
I agree with you wholeheartedly. Its hard not to take stuff like that to heart either. I've gotten difred up over the ignorance of people many times, not just here but other places too. I think people like that should be kicked off of mylot.
@pyewacket (43903)
• United States
13 Mar 08
I couldn't agree with you more, having been one of those who someone was leaving really nasty comments all over in some of my discussions I posted. I don't mind a good debate if it's within content of the discussion, I don't always expect people to agree with me, or I would hope that my friends here wouldn't expect me to always agree with them... For really heated issues I usually stay clear anyway. But it was last week that out of the blue someone here in effect began stalking me...the person made comments that had nothing to do with my discussions, was down right rude and insulting...At first I just made "cute" replies back but did point out to the person that the response being made didn't have anything to do with my discussions..then yikes, the person didn't let up...he kept attacking me, and not only me but make caustic remarks to my friends as well..clearly a person who had nothing better to do then create a "situation" that just plain wasn't pleasant. Not only I but many of my friends did report the person... all the person was interested in was to get our goats (to put it mildly) and who just wanted to make trouble for us
@ayou82 (3450)
• Philippines
13 Mar 08
One time my hubby and I argued because of Mylot. Not so serious but we are arguing about gossiping and i really had a mouthful about it and later on he gets back to me.. and said that mylot is what you call GOSSIPING.. which he misconstrued really wrong... Mylot is more of expressing your thoughts and feeling on a certain situation.. you're giving them knowledge and advise.. you are reaching out to people you dont know or haven't met yet. I dont see any problem doing mylotting.. it is fun isn't it???
• Canada
13 Mar 08
I always try to keep my responses positive sounding. I like when people rate my responses positivley as it helps to put the algorhythm in my favour. However, sometimes I read a post that i totally disagree with or I feel that the way they are treating a situation is a little extreme and they are harming themselves or other than I have to state my opinion whether or not it negativley affects my rating.
• United States
13 Mar 08
Seeing as how I just got here, I don't quite know the specifics, but I can understand this happening. The internet is a massive outlet for people to speak freely and anonymously. Such an outlet is inevitably doomed to exploitation by people who want to puff out there chest and seem superior to those around. The anonymity factor is damning in a way that people feel free to slander and offend anyone they disagree with because the only reputation to be damaged is one that they can easily recreate or cover up. Debates themselves are not harmless, they can be a way of conveying a point or persuading an idea. It is when the debater goes calling out people for the wrong reasons, or simply none at all.