Heather Mills McCartney
By mrtimharry
@mrtimharry (1180)
March 17, 2008 10:34am CST
Don't know whether you have heard but Paul McCartney has to pay £24.3million to Health Mills.
Personally think this i about £24million too much - though would have been happy to have put £24million in a trust fund for his daughter.
Not knowing all the evidence I would like to know what she thinks she contributed to Paul's money to initially demand £125 million
Any thoughts?
1 person likes this
6 responses
@whywiki (6066)
• Canada
17 Mar 08
I think it is too much too. I never liked her and think she moved in on him when he was weak and vulnerable after losing his one true love Linda. I think she probably couldn't wait to get pregnant so she could trap him. I could see giving her enough money to keep the daughter living in good style but I don't think she deserves as much as she is getting. It is his money from his talent after all. Poor Paul!
@mrtimharry (1180)
•
17 Mar 08
I' wonder where she will live now - not exactly the most popular person in uk and she doesn't really like US
1 person likes this
@theprogamer (10534)
• United States
19 Mar 08
Along with this story, did anyone hear about Pam Anderson's divorce, where she is getting alimony even though she made more than her ex? Anyone?
http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=1663
Anyways, the Mills issue is really annoying. Not only did she do nothing for the money, she somehow feels she's entitled to the money. Add the fact no one can logically explain why she deserves it, and then there's a real story. In reality, some of these alimony cases look like payment for nothing, and entitlement to assets one never acquired to begin with.
For another way of looking at this, the amount totals to rougly $1400 per hour for Mills' marriage to McCartney.
This may seem weird but besides feeling some sympathy for the children involved and for Paul to lesser extents... I actually feel for Linda.
1 person likes this
@mrtimharry (1180)
•
20 Mar 08
He was a bit stupid falling for her but think she was on the lookout for him and grabbed him when she could
1 person likes this
@sirensanssmile (3764)
• Netherlands
19 Mar 08
She deserved about enough to buy herself a one way ticket off the planet in my opinion. The child, if it is Paul's then of course should be supported but I would give that scheming witch anything outside of that.
She contributed nothing and watching her smug ugly face on tele tonight made me wish that someone would just hit her in that face of hers.
It is so obvious that she was after his money from the start and a judge should have taken that into consideration when awarding any sum to her.
How horrible. I hope that Paul will think twice before falling for that nonsense again.
What a manipulator she is.
1 person likes this
@mrtimharry (1180)
•
19 Mar 08
lol - i like your sentiments
Can't stand her, I have been reading the judgment on line and it looks like she lied or distorted the truth quite a bit
1 person likes this
@Foxfire1875 (2010)
•
18 Mar 08
It is a lot of money but surely only small change to Paul McCartney. Still that's not the point really as she did nothing to earn that money and it looks like she only married him to achieve this divorce payout.
@mrtimharry (1180)
•
18 Mar 08
she doesn't do herself any favours in the press either - think the mirror cover says she threw water over McCartney's lawyer
1 person likes this
@Foxfire1875 (2010)
•
18 Mar 08
It was in all the papers. She does seem totally barking. Can't think what she was trying to achieve by throwing water over McCartney's lawyer.
I wish I'd taken that photo that is in every newspaper, the photographer must be making a fortune.
1 person likes this
@jameskempton (145)
•
19 Mar 08
I think Heather Mills should not have got a penny. I don't care if she is accustomed to a lavish and luxurious way of life. She wasn't poor before the marriage and she decided to step away from that lifestyle and should live with the consequences. The expression on her face when she came out of court snarling with her eyes twitching was astounding. Is £24.3 million not enough for her? She doesn't care about charities, she just wants to try to improve her public image. It's no wonder she tried to stop the recent details of the divorce going public.
In my opinion,
She is nothing more than a common thief!
1 person likes this
@mrtimharry (1180)
•
20 Mar 08
One of the judge's comments was that there was no tax returns to support her claims of charity giving
1 person likes this
@ladym33 (10979)
• United States
28 Mar 08
She really wanted way too much for a 5 year marriage. If they had been married longer then she should have gotten more. To him 24 million is not really going to break him. But like you I don't understand why she would feel she would be entitled to more. I guess she wanted to get paid 25 million per year of marriage.