Does anyone even read the replies before responding??
By cyntrow
@cyntrow (8523)
United States
April 25, 2008 2:15pm CST
I came across a discussion about a rape case. It sounded very much like an email that I receieved so I went to snopes and looked it up. Sure enough, it was a hoax. So I responded letting the poster know that it was a hoax and where I found the information. The very next respondant, replied about how horrible this "case of rape" was. Two more people pointed out that it was an urban legend. Then, the very next person jumped in to say how twisted people had to be to do this sort of thing.
So my question is, do you read the other replies before posting? This was not a long discussion; only 2 pages, so there was no reason not to read all the replies. I'm curious to know what makes people tick, so let me know.
11 people like this
30 responses
@II2aTee (2559)
• United States
25 Apr 08
Haha - That is asking quite a bit Cyn.
How can we expect people to read all the responses when 99% of the time people don't even read the entire original discussion topic.
I highly doubt most people read past the title. At least that is my experience.
5 people like this
@foxyfire33 (10005)
• United States
25 Apr 08
If a discussion has 80 responses then no, I won't read them all but I try to read the first 2 pages or so at least. On discussions with fewer responses, yes I take the time to read what was said. I don't want to just repeat the same ting 10 other people have said plus I want to read how the original poster has commented since they may have added new information or clarified an issue. Also, just like the case you mentioned, I want to make sure I really do know what type of discussion I'm responding to.
4 people like this
@Angelwhispers (8978)
• United States
26 Apr 08
Cyn, I am guilty of not reading untill after I post because like right now I am answering through my email. After I post I then read, and will amend my comment accordingly. I do not always answer through email, but I lose conversations I wanted to post in if I do not sometimes.
But I know exactly what you are saying here. I do think alot of mylotters just read part of the post, then respond and off they go to the next one not giving, the last one a single thought.
As i said I do try and amend my post or at least acknowledge that I did not read the entire discussion before I posted.
2 people like this
@cyntrow (8523)
• United States
26 Apr 08
But why? I guess I just dont get it. I always read the post and at least two pages of replies. I love reading what others write. Sometimes it adds to my view. Sometimes it gives me a different perspective. But always, it allows me to see what people feel and that is important. This is a discussion site. If you don't see what everyone else is saying before you post, are you not closing the discussion before it begins? And when I say "You" and am speaking generally, not specifically. If, as in the example I cited, three people say this is a hoax and you don't read prior to posting, are you not killing the entire discussion and your own credibility? Just a thought. I must admit, that I am very nosey, so I do want to see what people say. LOL. But I think it helps me instead of hindering me.
1 person likes this
@Angelwhispers (8978)
• United States
26 Apr 08
Oh don't get me wrong, I do enjoy the whole conversation, and if I make a mistake in my post from the email like I said I do amend it. I only do it occasionally to begin with, its easier than hunting and pecking for discussions you might have missed. I sometimes to feel like a few of my friends get neglected because their discussions might not be as popular and get pushed down, out of the list. I am a loyal person and try to cover everyone that is on my friends list and is active and come to be special friends.
I see your point oh so very clearly though. I understand and taken it to heart!
2 people like this
@wrdsofwisdm (1069)
• United States
25 Apr 08
Absolutely!
The point of responding for me, is to bring something new to the table. If the first responders covered everything, I don't respond by repeating what they already posted.
By reading responses to a post I also noticed that some don't answer the discussion starter's questions because they possibly didn't read the whole thing before answering.
4 people like this
@anniepa (27955)
• United States
26 Apr 08
I usually read the replies unless I'm responding from the e-mail notification, which my friend Oreo already pointed out that she does the same thing. Sometimes I don't read through every single word of every response but I try to read most of them. I've had experiences where I'm sure some responders read little more than the title or even just a word or two in the title. I read their response and I'm like - "HUH?"...lol
Annie
2 people like this
@cyntrow (8523)
• United States
26 Apr 08
You know, I thought that there was an option to view the discussion. It seems that there isn't. I have contacted mylot about this. It[s in their guidelines that we should read replies before responding. It's stupid that there is not such an option. Having said all that,, I am pleased at the responses. They have led me to a different viewpoint, Oreo being the first. She's a gem.
1 person likes this
@ayumitakashi (4462)
• United States
25 Apr 08
There are times when I do read the responses. I mean if the discussion is not too long then I'll read it but if it's too long then I will just read the first two pages or less. But there are times when I just respond.
3 people like this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
26 Apr 08
Hello Cyntrow,
Great question!!!
I'm heartened to learn that others do read, at least some of, the other respondent's contributions. I also appreciate the honesty of those who admit that they don't. I tend to stay out of discussions that have gobs of responses -- with only one notable exception, because that member responds to every single response! I don't know how he doesn't get bored to tears doing so, though I deeply respect his commitment!
I recently posted a discussion that was corrected in the news a couple of hours after the original story aired. I posted the correction to each respondent on the first page, and the first respondent on the second page, thinking that that would suffice. Boy, was I wrong! I ended up posting the correction in all but a few of the later responses. The exceptions were where folks were nice enough to let me know that they had already read the correction. I will admit that I was surprised that so few people read the other respondent's comments. I find that there are great jewels in the rough among the plethora of varying perspective! So, I consider that input as a dessert to be savored. Well, most of the time, anyway (chuckle, chuckle).
In the case of that discussion, the e-mail notification can be pretty much ruled out, as many of the respondents were not on my Friend's List.
I only choose one to maybe four discussions to participate in daily. Notice that I didn't say 'respond to'? That's because I very much value discussion. Opining has it's place, though my take is that there is a much greater opportunity to learn from our fellow MyLotters if discussion is fostered. I also recognize that some folks are here to make some money. That is their goal, and I do not begrudge them. Though, my goal is, as I said, discussion. As such, I more appreciate the smaller discussions, populated by respondents who I know also share a knowledge goal. And, I consider it a very great treat when respondent's discuss among themselves. To me, that is the greatest bonus in a discussion!
I guess it's a pretty safe bet that I will never post a discussion asking: "What's your favorite color?", eh?
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
26 Apr 08
Oh, and I should add:
Regarding the commendable member perhaps getting bored -- he typically draws MANY pages of responses. Geesh, I would think that once the pages start to approach ten or more, that it's got border on tedium. Which, of course, is why he is to be commended for maintaining his enthusiasm throughout!!!
1 person likes this
@ladyluna (7004)
• United States
26 Apr 08
Hello Cyntrow,
"If I am not reading, I am not learning." This is very nicely said, Cyntrow!
You're point is well taken; wisdom IS cumulative. So, if we're not open to the thoughts and ideas of others, how can we know our own perspective -- whether it is to solidify it, or morph it?
Are you familiar with "Desiderata", by Max Ehrmann? It is a creed that I have long efforted myself to live by. One line in particular stands out, relative to your original question: "Listen to others, even the dull and ignorant, for they too have their story". Words to live by, eh?
1 person likes this
@mummymo (23706)
•
26 Apr 08
Well cyn honey I have to say I very rarely read the other responses before responding myself as i uaually reply direct from notification. I know some people don't like that but I find it easier and also know I am giving MY answer and not just echoing other peoples ideas. I do read the responses AFTER I have added my 2 cents worth though! xxx
1 person likes this
@cyntrow (8523)
• United States
26 Apr 08
My thing is that many times, other respondants actually add to my view. I also love to reply to other responses. i love to learn from others. If everyone does this, than why do I fight. i fight because people have to see what I've written and if they are on the fense, maybe I can teach them something. If they are skipping everything, they are learning nothing.
3 people like this
@youless (112561)
• Guangzhou, China
26 Apr 08
Most of the time I won't read the replies before responding to the discussions. As I am afraid it will have an effect on my views. I want to respond by my own thoughts and don't want to involve and mix with other ideas.
I love China
@cyntrow (8523)
• United States
26 Apr 08
Whatever works for you is great, but I love learning. I dig seeing other responses, for it might add something to what I feel. Or it may open my mind to another viewpoint. If we are stagnent, we are less than human. Others can create an option to where we can open our minds.
I would never reply if I have not at least read one page of replies. It just strikes me as disrespectful of my fellow mylotters
1 person likes this
@Fidget (291)
•
26 Apr 08
Argh! Now I'm torn! How to reply? Should I respond to someone else's post to show that I've read it? Or should I wait to the end to show I've read all the posts but if I just post at the end will you thing that I've just skipped straight there and ignored everything everyone else has said??!! Noooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!
Oh yeah, I try and read what others say.
Also, I may be every so slightly sleep deprived, sorry for the insanity!
1 person likes this
@Hatley (163776)
• Garden Grove, California
26 Apr 08
cyntrow I often do not read the replies before responding as I want my reply to be from my own thoughts not someone else's thoughts . we are cautioned by mylot not to repeat exactly others replies and anyway I like to use myown judgementwhen I reply to something. How was I to know this was an urban legend as I was probably one who thought it was real. A lot of others here do not read all the replies for the same reason, we do not want to ape what everyone else has said. Instead of worrying so much about us not reading all the replies should not the poster be darned sure that what he or she is posting is real fact?
1 person likes this
@cyntrow (8523)
• United States
26 Apr 08
I can see your point, hatley and I respect that. but my thing is that I learn from each and every post. Sure if I come on a discussion late and they have over 100, I can't read all of them, but I can get a sampling. I would consider it disrespectful to not consider others viewpoints when forming mine. I learn daily from everyone. I refuse to be stagnent.
As for your last sentence, how many times have you recievd an email from a friend or family member such the one I referenced. They believe it is total fact and want to warn everyone they care about. It;s my responsiblity to believe it and forward it or not. I love snopes.com. I use it all the time. You should bookmark it.
1 person likes this
@tjades (3591)
• Jamaica
26 Apr 08
I dont think anyone here as the time to read through all responses in every discussion that they respond to. I certainly dont and more so as I respond many times straight from my email.
In fact as I responded to that discussion in one of the manner you referred to I should also point out that I received your response to my comment in my email and responded to you from there as well. I cant spend full time on here and so have to keep up in this manner.
So overall my answer is no. I dont always read before I respond.
@cyntrow (8523)
• United States
26 Apr 08
With respect, it doesn't take but a minute to read a page or two worth of replies. Sorry, but I read at least a sampling. I respect all views. To ignore all would be wrong, in my eyes. I'm not saying that you should feel the same. Respondants add to my feelings. I reply to respondants. It doesn't take much time. I work outstid the home40 hours, plus commute. i go to school. I take care of 4 children. Still I can take 5 minutes to read a couple dozen replies before responding. I don't think its too much.
1 person likes this
@kezabelle (2974)
•
25 Apr 08
No I will honestly admit to not reading the responses sometimes, if I have something to say il say it no matter what anyone else might have written
2 people like this
@lingli_78 (12822)
• Australia
26 Apr 08
i don't read every single responds from other users before responding... especially if there are heaps of responds... it will take me ages to read all of them... but i do read some of them and i make sure that i won't repeat the same response that i had read before...
1 person likes this
@lovespecialangel (3632)
• United States
25 Apr 08
I have to admit that I normally don't read the replies before I respond. Are you talking about the woman who was lead to the scene by the little girl? If so, I am one of the ones that responded. I've never heard of it as an urban legend.
1 person likes this
@cyntrow (8523)
• United States
26 Apr 08
But if you had read what I and a couple of other people had written you would have known. I'm not saying that to be mean and nasty, but what kind of discussions are we really having if we are not paying any attention to what is being discussed? There are plenty of different views. I like to learn and we can only learn from others. If we are not paying attention to "others" how can we learn?
Just my thoughts.
2 people like this
@sid556 (30959)
• United States
26 Apr 08
No. I know we should and I really know I should but time is short here. I all too often will respond and then go back thru the replies. I will often find in the replies answers to questions I have asked or realize the person has not explained himself right in the original post and had I read, I would have known this. Knowing all that, I still am guilty as sin.
1 person likes this
@cinderella2007 (2662)
•
26 Apr 08
I dont always read the responses but if I do, I might just read the first page. I will read the responses after if I didnt read them before as if I read them before their views are still in my head and that might sway my way of thinking and what I want to put down.
I dont think many people do read the responses as more than often, a few people say more or less the same thing!!
1 person likes this