14 Deadly sins!!!!!!!! No more 7!!!!!!

well that really got me thinking. I guess they are alright, because it gives us something to strive for. I'm not sure they should be included with the deadly sins though. The new ones seem a little out of our control on the most part.

the newly added sins are more specific and timely..

They are really way out there, and yes you are right we all commit at least some of these during our life times. We probably shouldn't do these things, but.....

Well, for starters I totally disagree with four of the original seven. As for the new ones, I'm down with number 8, 11, 13 (I think... I'm not clear what that means...), and 14 (again, I think... I don't know what that means exactly either.) Now if he'd just add something about animal rights to the list I'd be set.

Instead of adding new things to a list that was made after G'd's laws were already written, why don't folks just follow as many of the 613 mitzvot that are in the Bible or Torah or as most of the uninformed call it the old testament? A Mitzvot is a Commandment from G'd, and there are 613 of them in the Torah. Some of them cannot be followed anymore because the Temple was destroyed, but there are a whole lot of them that are still viable. They are easily found online, if you do not wish to search them out in the Bible for yourself. I know a lot of folks like to have the Bible spoon fed to them. The mitzvot are not written in jibberish. They state very plainly what they mean. No one has to decifer or expain anything for you. And they were given to us by G'd not a man who has lived a secluded life. Shalom~Adoniah

The new ones are actually irrelevant. except for 12, that is.

I think it's ok, he just made it more specific. Although thee maybe all part of the old ones. Maybe it would be better if they match or made the the new ones the example of the old. Like accumulating excessive wealth is the sample of greed.

See the original 7 have only 0ne word and they describe the fundamental human nature, I think all the other new ones can be interpreted through the 7 original ones.

what do you all think.... people shouldn't even have the right to show their emotions!! the first 7 sins are actually common emotions that a human being faces and common things that a person does!! if i see a hot chick... my mind says wow shez good... if some1 smacks me... i get angry if i see my competitor grow i envy if i work late i wake up late!! if i like a dish i eat it more.... well a human without emotions is a robot...!!

I think it's okay. At least this sets good goals we all should strive to achieve no matter what religion,lol. And many struggled with the first seven already. Now we have more to confess to and to repent;)

I don't agree with the extra 7 added on deadly sins. My view is the original seven deadly sins are internal. Whereas 8 to 14 are external. Doesn't make sense to me. The seven deadly sins are feelings/wants/needs/emotions (not sure how to describe it, sorry? that are stirred within humans and generally on an individual basis (not always) it can be a trait within us. Whereas 8 to 10 aren't within us, its not a personality trait and 8 to 10 seem to be consequences in my eyes. I'd also like to point out that the 7 deadly sins cause the 8 to 10 sins if you see as i do the 8 to 10 sins as consequences. e.g. sin 10 accumulating excessive wealth well surely that comes about due to greed amongst others. For this reason i feel 8 to 10 is unnecessary its already there in the original 7. If i look at the list as 14 deadly sins i certainty don't agree with the last seven nor do i believe they belong. Looking at 8 to 10 are i guess a modern take on the seven deadly sins but they also are specific. Seven deadly sins can apply to all ages, others can't. Also 8 to 10 are modern day problems, i think this list needs to be taken away from the seven deadly sins and looked at by itself. But there are so many problems/sins in the world today do these 7 really sum it all up?