what would you prefer.
By doomstay982
@doomstay982 (239)
United States
July 7, 2008 11:24pm CST
Would you prefer freedom or Security, and you can't have both( its a decision that will take time to see your results and only then you can be truly happy at your decision), would you force ppl to accept your decision? Its been in my head for little over 6 months now so their the question.
1 person likes this
3 responses
@fjgamer (543)
• United States
8 Jul 08
Freedom. Pure freedom. If you disagree with someone, it should be up to you to resolve the conflict; not the government.
@doomstay982 (239)
• United States
8 Jul 08
yeah as long you follow rules, but I understand what you mean This is the kind of stuff I think when i stare at the wall, with is right next to my pc screen.lol.
@kissie34 (2294)
• Philippines
8 Jul 08
I'll choose security because I am not the only one who will be secured but the whole people.. I think to be free isn't good at all because sometimes because of our freedom we do something that can harm other people.. If we are free to do the things that we want then there is a possibility that you will be selfish and not being aware that you are already hurting other people.. Security is a better way to stop terrorism and other harmful things.. Many people will live happily and have a peaceful mind, since they know that they are secured...
Actually, it is easy to be free but it is difficult to be secured.. Once, we decide something we are already doing or achieving freedom but then we cannot get security from our decisions and from our actions.. So, I prefer to choose security because I know that I am safe and I can still do the things that I want to do..
@doomstay982 (239)
• United States
8 Jul 08
I would personally choice freedom. Since that would mean you would have to depend on your self and if something really bad happens you would fine a way support your self. As for be free and hurting other for being selfish then something really bad is going to happen to me, since what goes around come around and for this concept never fails to work and when it does work it shows no mercy. Its actually harder to be free then secured, when your free you will try your best at making sure you don't harass ppl. as for being secured you will be sacrafice something for it and I will never be able to do this.
So lets look at it in both extremes at two angles both good and bad, And what
can they could do to us & what they can't.
-the below are just scenarios- not the real thing i hope-
and doesn't having security means someone has to be in power, and can some one over power that person with items or such.
What would happen if someone suspects you for being a terrorists jsut because you wouldn't take a vaccine
