Who do you think should get more recognition when a film does well?
By Rintis
@Rintis (646)
India
August 25, 2008 5:38am CST
Actors, Directors, Producers, Scriptwriter, musicians, singers, technicians,...who is it that you appreciate when a film does badly of exceptionally well.
I would give full credit to the director as a film is his baby. He decides which story to go for. Which actor or actresses would be suitable to enact that particular role. He visualizes the film even before it is complete.
1 person likes this
4 responses
@sachin_vas (24)
• India
25 Aug 08
hi Rintis,
firstly i consider the director plays a big role in the movie making because he has to made the movie and he has to teach everyone for their roles in the movie the i would give preference to the actor and actress for the movie performance.
@ishralene09 (2260)
• Philippines
25 Aug 08
Usually I look at the artists first. If they act well, they receive my praises. But then there's those films that the actors and actresses I barely know, so when I see it and it is ends up beautiful, I look at who are on the background. But then for the whole credit, it should go to the director, because he's the one who supervises the creation of the film. Without him, there would be disorder. Producers produces the movie, scripwriters writes script for the movie, actors they act for the movie...but the director is the one who makes the movie into a reality so for me it's all thanks to him. That's just my opinion.
@alokn99 (5717)
• India
25 Aug 08
It's normally the whole team that should be given credit when a film does well. Obviously the credit is normally given to the director and the main stars. So often we forget the role of the people behind the scenes.
@vanities (11395)
• Davao, Philippines
25 Aug 08
i guess its the story line that should be recognize right away then the actress and so and so forth and in general i guess all the people involve in the movies should be properly recognize since without them the movie will not be finish or turn out well..