camera quality
good photo
macro photography
megapixel
photo blog
photog
pixelshots
sony ericsson blog
Is MEGAPIXEL value all about a camera's quality?
By pgew550
@pgew550 (76)
India
September 6, 2008 10:18pm CST
I dont think a camera of huge megapixel value can take good photos.. there are many other factors which results in good photo.
From brands to brands the capabilities differ. what is the factor that makes one brand superior to another. Why the photographs taken under same conditions of different branded cameras differ. Have you ever thought??????????
I have something to say to you in my blog www.pixelshots.blogspot.com.
Do visit and post your comments about what you think off about the subject...
Thank you
5 responses
@oiixdaii (1059)
• Philippines
11 Sep 08
For me, camera megapixel is a lot of factor since I'm still learning composition I have a large photo and still can crop it to improve the composition and still have a large phto
@thebeing (657)
• Romania
9 Sep 08
actually, the MP does count. A LOT! but not in the way that one would expect. And, not alone!
when we talk about MP, we should consider one more thing (and this is proof why DSLRs are better than point and shoot), and that is, THE SENSOR SIZE! 10 mp is better quality than 15 mp on sensors with the same size. The more the mp, the smaller the actual pixel, and less the information. Your image will still have the same subjects in it, and it will look the same zoomed way out.
on the other hand, more mp are better for cropping. you can't take perfect images everytime, so you'll wanna crop some of them. here, the extra mp come in handy.
the mp affair is a very debated subject on the internet. some say it's better, some say it's the same thing, while others say it's worse.
if you don't plan to do monstrous prints, i don't think that the difference with be so noticeable.
cheers!
@macubx (11414)
• Philippines
7 Sep 08
nice cool, i really dont think megapixel affect the quality of the pictures too.. and i think megapixels only affect the size of the image.. its like comparing a cybershot 5.0 megapixel from a 3.0 megapixel DSR.. what ever angle you took.. DSR always win in an overall quality...
@repzkoopz (1895)
• Philippines
7 Sep 08
pixel values are not the only factor you'll have to consider in defining the quality. honestly i'm not familiar with photography terms, but i'll chip in what i know. for quality, you'll also have to consider the processor speed, zoom capacity, facial recognition (in some digicams).
@commanderxo (1494)
• Canada
7 Sep 08
Hi there pgew...
Here we go;
1 Mega = 1 million
1 Pixel = 1 single sqaure
Therefore:
the HIGHER the number of mega-pixels, the SHARPER the image.
Other QUALITY factors such as: name brand, speed, lens, zoom, screen size, even price, etc...all aid in the buying of a digital camera. These factors are really left up to the buyer's personal preference. But the QUALITY or SHARPNESS of the IMAGE, is detemined by the HIGHEST number of pixels that a camera's screen is divided into.
The minimum for most basic digital camers is set around 7 mega pixels.
Although, even a 4 mega pixel camera, can produce fine quality images.
A SINGLE pixel image, is what is seen in an E-mail.
cdrxo