Seeking camera reccomendations
@actualfactual (57)
United States
December 29, 2008 3:45pm CST
I would like to buy a digital camera that can take good, close up pictures of small insects (as small as 10mm). The insects would be still, so the camera would not have to be able to take pictures of moving objects. Any reccomendations?
2 responses
@Davidarich (985)
• Australia
30 Dec 08
Any mid-range digital camera will do this using their standard macro setting, so long as you choose a model with minimum shutter lag (you ant to take the photo when you press the button, not several moments later!)
However the choice of camera should be based on what you want to do with your images: if you just want to see them on a screen or print postcard size prints, anything with more than 6 megapixels will do, and 8 megapixels will give more scope if you need to crop part of the image. If want quality prints up to A4, 10x8 or even A3 or similar size with fine detail, then choose something with 10 megapixels or better and image stabilization (at macro magnification, tiny amounts of camera shake get magnified too, and enlarging the print makes matters worse).
If you intend the images for museum quality reproduction, or to be seen and use by people with real expertise in etymology, like an enthusiast collector, a naturalist or a conservator, then real detail has to be preserved and you will need a high quality lens and a low-noise sensor. An SLR with a macro lens would be ideal (even the most basic DSLR will perform extremely well with, say, a fast 50mm, 90mm or 120mm macro lens. But "prosumer", "bridge" or enthusiast compacts, with their ability to allow manual focus and shutter/aperture control when needed, will also give outstanding result for about half to 2/3 the cost of an SLR.
If you go the compact route, I would seriously suggest one of the FZ series Panasonic Lumix cameras; their Leica lenses and layout are ideal for this area of photography. G series Canon cameras are a very good choice, and the Canon Powershot SX cameras would be a top choice, too.
I am not suggesting that no other cameras would suit, but my experience with a wide range of brands and models places these cameras at the top of the list as viable alternatives to SLRs for macro,
Do not rely on image stabilization, valuable though it is. Get a steady tripod! Nothing adds quality to macro like a solid 'pod.
@actualfactual (57)
• United States
30 Dec 08
Thanks for all of the tips. I am leaning toward the Powershot. I think 8 megapixels will be fine for most of my pics, but 10 would be great. How do I know what the shutter lag will be for a given camera? Is this info published anywhere, or I guess I should go to a good camera shop where the staff will know.
@Davidarich (985)
• Australia
31 Dec 08
Camera revew usually comment on shutter lag/response but the best thing is to find that decent camera shop and try the camera out!