is it real

The thing about ghost hunters is that they are not there to prove a place is haunted. They actually go in and try to disprove or prove once in awhile that a place has or doesn't have paranormal activity. As someone who has personally experience paranormal events it is refreshing to seeing these guys go in and try to debunk some of the events people are experiencing and not doing it like some of the other shows out there. The best way I can tell you to go about possibly having a paranormal experience is to join a local paranormal group and join in on some of their investigations. I can tell you from personal experience that for the most part you may go on several investigations before you ever have an experience. Most times it ends up being very boring, but on some it is very exciting and sometimes hair raising. Happy ghost hunting.

I don't think is fake, if it was fake every single place they visit, they would say that it was haunted, which is not always the case. There's the evidence, you either believe it or not. I have seen so many strange in my life and I believe in ghosts just like I believe in the show.

Honestly, I really don't think this show is fake. I think that they go in there and just investigate things. They are impartial for the most part. I have watched the show since it started several years ago and I know there are fewer times that they do find ghosts or hauntings or activities than when they don't. I think they are just regular guys who do this and they are not making it more than it is. On the other hand I have seen many other ghost shows that are so obviously fake that it is not even funny. Have a nice day and happy myLotting!!!

Fake, real... I personally don't care. I like the show because it gets me thinking of the possibility of ghosts.... plus it's fun to watch! (at least it's fun for me) :-) :-)

It's definantly fake. I was at a friends house yesterday working on their computer, and half paying attention to it on the tv and it was so easy to debunk. Nothing of substance, bogus science, unverifiable testimonies, citing extremely vague data that is shown to be conclusive. On a con artist scale of one to ten I would give them a 2.5, it was really bad, they put no effort put forth to con people at all.