If Health Care is a Basic Human Right...

@ParaTed2k (22940)
Sheboygan, Wisconsin
June 10, 2009 10:33am CST
Health care as a basic human right is one of the arguments for socialized medicine. If it is a basic human right, then should the government have the authority to not make medical care available to everyone? If we have nationalized medical care, the government wouldn't be able to deny anyone timely care. This means that care for all diagnosed illnesses and injuries would have to be made available before the problem gets worse. All follow up tests and treatment would have to be performed well in advance of any worsening prognosis. Since it has been established that we have a right to decide what to do with our bodies, then the government couldn't penalize anyone for unhealthy life choices. Eating foods high in trans fats, refined sugar, bleached flour, deep fat fried and other "junk foods" could never be a reason to withhold or delay treatment. So far, no country with nationalized health care has been able to live up to this rhetoric. It is one lie after the other.
1 person likes this
6 responses
@Galena (9110)
11 Jun 09
why would anyone rather NOT have national health care than have it? we have the NHS. it's not PERFECT, but it's THERE. and I'm so glad that it is. to not have free healthcare availiable to all is just unthinkable to me. I remember being really shocked to find America doesn't have an equivalent to the NHS. before that I would have assumed only third world countries didn't offer free healthcare. how awful must it be to worry about whether or not you can AFFORD to have treatment for a condition.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
11 Jun 09
What is Free about nationalized health care? If it's so great, why do the people who can afford to pay for it out of pocket instead of rely on government run health care? How many people die from treatable illnesses and injuries simply because your government has decided they aren't worth saving?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
11 Jun 09
If it is a basic human right, then everyone who has ever been denied medical care in your country has had their rights violated by your government.
@Galena (9110)
11 Jun 09
as I said, it's not perfect. there's only so much in the way of funds to go round. but at least it's there. at least when people choose to pay for private health care, that means that the cost of their treatment is availiable for someone else. if you can afford to pay, then that means there's more to go around for those that can't. people mostly pay for private care because they can get treatment quicker. a common complaint about the NHS is the waiting lists for non emergency treatment. from a purely shallow point of view, without the NHS, my facial scars from a dog bite would have been much worse. I could never have afforded to pay privately for the minor reconstructive surgery I had. so the scars would have been much more noticeable. as it is, most people don't even know I had them. whearas with just the emergency treatment, they weren't healing that neatly. and if I couldn't even have afforded the emergency treatment, I'd have had to just leave it. I mean the bleeding would have stopped, infection could be treated at home with salt water, and I'd probably have a really disfiguring scar. but I never had to decide whether or not to have it treated based on finances. and when my partner was in hospital for six months, and aftercare with home visits (at one point his home visits, blood tests and medication probably cost the best part of £100 EVERY DAY, according to a family member who is a nurse in the NHS) well that would have financially crippled us. there's no way we could have afforded it. the NHS doesn't have a bottomless pit of funds, so it has to be selective with some treatments and medications, but I would still not ever want to live in a country where they have no free health care system.
@katran (585)
• United States
12 Jun 09
Fact: The US spends more money per person on health care than any other nation in the world. Fact: The US is ranked 37th in the world as far as quality of health care. Fact: Japan has the world's healthiest people, and they boast what you would mistakenly call a "socialized" medical system. Fact: Britain and Canada are BOTH ahead of the US as far as quality of health care. I am not saying we need socialized health care, but we need to do SOMETHING. I recommend watching Frontline's Sick Around the World. You can watch it online. Most Americans have a TON of misconceptions about "socialized" health care. There are options other than putting hospitals themselves under government control that would extend health care to everyone. And if we're already spending more money PER PERSON on health care than any other nation in the world, I think the money argument is kinda tired by now.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
12 Jun 09
Canada and the UK both send patients they don't want to bother with to the US for treatment. Don't tell me how great their systems are if they are using our system as a fall back or overflow. What are the UK and Canada going to do if we go socialized and they don't have our system to fall back on anymore?
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
12 Jun 09
But more to the point of my article... Do any of those countries delay or deny any treatment to any of their people?
@katran (585)
• United States
12 Jun 09
There are some delays, yes, but I don't think anyone in "those" countries are denied health care. I think that is kind of the point. Also, delays in other countries are not as bad as you would think. The UK is the worst, but Japan, Switzerland, Taiwan, Germany, and several other countries have modified systems that have very little wait times. No worse than here. And yes, there are delays here. I have been waiting over 6 months to hear back from a periodontist who was supposed to do surgery on my gums.
@venshida (4836)
• United States
10 Jun 09
It would make sense they should have the right not to make it available for everyone, but from a realistic stand point it would never happen. I pray we do not have nationalized health care like they have in Canada, etc.
@4ftfingers (1310)
11 Jun 09
I think that has a lot to do with societies new views on over-earting and obesity. It's not concidered greed anymore, it's now concidered an 'illness', and so it's offensive to penalise someone on that basis. In my oppinion if you trash your body, you should be penalised. I may be slim but if I was fat I'd like to think I'd have the same oppinion, it's not difficult to balance your diet.
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
11 Jun 09
So if you trashed your body in a car accident you should be penalized?
11 Jun 09
No ofcourse I don't mean that parated, look at what I'm talking about, by trash your body I mean self inflicting poor health on yourself. Very true grammasnook, I supose in an ideal world it would be nice to be able to know exactly who is obese by the cause of illness and who is as a result of poor choices, but ofcourse that's not possible. I think it's a shame that everyone can now claim it to be a result of illness, even if it isn't.
• United States
11 Jun 09
Sometimes being obese has nothing to do with how much food you eat or poor choices. Most obese people have underlying problems such as abuse, thyroid, tumors, main organ problems. So please do not think it is about being a glutton, many health issues can cause obesity. Depression for example lots of those medications cause major weight gain, so the person gains weight and is now even more depressed than before. Just wanted to point out that it is not always a choice.
@vellibiz (297)
• United States
10 Jun 09
i know right, but its not fair that the people who work there butts of get the same care of someone who doesnt do anything...any type of insurance is extortion...insurance companies should all be illegal..but there not. it should be "we get what we put in" just like social security should be. I dont thinks its fair i have to pay for someone elses grandpa or grandma, now if they were vets i'd gladly pay no problems i would even offer to pay more...
@ParaTed2k (22940)
• Sheboygan, Wisconsin
11 Jun 09
Well, private insurance isn't any kind of extortion at all. It is a service just like any other. Government forced insurance (however) is extortion.
• United States
10 Jun 09
If healthcare is a right, does a medical professional have to provide service without compensation? Just asking, because even now (we have sections of our healthcare that are socialized now) this is what is happening in a lot of areas. Doctors are being required to provide service at prices that don't even cover the cost of the staff to provide provide the service, never mind paying for the building, supplies and paperwork involved. What this means is that in order to not lose too much money they have to push paitients through as fast as possible, which inevitably leads to lower quality healthcare as well as less incentives for people to study medicine.