does the end can justify the mean?

@ckyera (17331)
Philippines
July 1, 2009 8:23am CST
i mean, is it okay to do bad things provided that you have a good intention in doing so? for example, robinhood rob people and give the money to the poor one, some lie because they don't want others to be hurt, mercy killing...they kill because they don't want the dying person suffer more... so what do you think? does the end can justify the mean? thanks! have a nice day!
6 people like this
11 responses
@lucy67 (819)
• China
1 Jul 09
it's hard to say but in most cases, i don't think the end can justify the means. in order to achieve the so-called good end, you may hurt someone and the one you hurt perhaps doesn't think that's the good end for him or it's impossible for him to enjoy the good end but he has already been hurt.
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
1 Jul 09
i think so...and sooner or later ,this mean that you do just to achieve the "good" end will soon haunt you and will ruin that good end that you get... thanks for sharing...
1 person likes this
@laydee (12798)
• Philippines
1 Jul 09
I don't believe in that line. Regardless the goal, if people are affected or traumatized, I don't think it could justify the means whatsoever. Let's take for example a country who wants to be rid of the poor. Well, a country could just decide to kill them all. Economically speaking, it would really lead to a country with more income and less problems because the poor is eliminated. But morally speaking, you can't do that. It's just not right. People have rights, regardless the status in life. Regardless how good a goal is, the way on executing actions to reach that goal is still vital. As for mercy killing. Holding on to a life that couldn't really work without the assistance of machines, isn't a life anymore.
2 people like this
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
1 Jul 09
yes i think you also have a point...sacrificing innocent poor people for the welfare of the county's economy is really something that's unacceptable...even how good the intention is, if we will hur somebody along the way...its still not good. thanks for sharing...
1 person likes this
@kun2349 (23381)
• Singapore
1 Jul 09
Hello babe ^_^ That's such a difficult question to answer huh?? haha =D What seems wrong to us, might be right to others, and vice versa.. Thus, there's no real right or wrong to it.. Some things might be wrong on the side of feelings, but it's right to do in the eyes of law ^_^ THus, end can justify the mean as well as not.. It's hard to strike a balance between the two.. However, both of them can co-exist at the same time, with 'compassion' being the medium.. hehe ^_^ Did i confused u?? lol =D
1 person likes this
@kun2349 (23381)
• Singapore
3 Jul 09
lol =D Yeah, i was busy last couple of days and thus i was not able to be in mylot.. hehe ^_^ Did u missed me huh?? lol =D Yup, u are right in saying that too, because everything happens for a reason.. For example, i have robbed u of your money, but my intention is for my grandma hospitalisation fees, and so judge might reduce my sentence based on compassionate.. BUt if i were to rob u for my own gain, then my sentence will definitely be heavier ^_^
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
4 Jul 09
yes, i miss you on my discussions coz you are one of those who really are into a discussion... well again, depends upon the situation and the judgment of the one who's looking at it! i think , its really hard to justify the end by its mean specially if the mean is mean! hehehe
1 person likes this
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
2 Jul 09
yes you are...after a while of being lost in the discussions, now you are back confusing me! hehehe but anyway, so you mean that being bad or good, justifiable or not depends on who are looking at it? well maybe you are right coz even in courts, the decisions of the judges differs...there are some cases that the charged is being acquitted in a crime even though he actually do that crime...because the judge consider the reason why he do such things...am i saying it right?
2 people like this
@yugasini (12893)
• Secunderabad, India
1 Jul 09
hi ckyera, the thing you are doing from the morning to the evening all 24 hours are prepared before itself,people after dying they caliculate good and bad things according to that they choose their parents and taking birth and live accordingly, do not worry, best luck
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
4 Jul 09
ok thanks!
@yugasini (12893)
• Secunderabad, India
4 Jul 09
hi ckyera, do not worry, be happy, thanks for the comment
@JamieRose (168)
• Philippines
2 Jul 09
THE END SHOULD JUSTIFY THE MEANS. If one person has a good intention but does it in a bad way, then I think it is wrong and unjust. For example, Robin Hood (cartoons) robs from the rich people to give money to the poor. Clearly, his intention is good: he wants to give money to the needy. But his manner of achieving this intention is wrong: robbing rich people. I believe that with whatever you do and however you choose to do something, you should always choose to do the right thing. It is a cruel world out there, but it doesn't mean you have to be cruel with it :) Be good and be happy.
1 person likes this
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
2 Jul 09
hi there! thanks for sharing... but i think there are some cases that the end can justify the means...like for example in case of you have to defend yourself...for sure we can do something that is against the law in order to defend ourselves...but we do it unintentionally therefore in this case it might be considerable...but if your mean is something that you have planned and very intentional well it can't justified anything even how good your intention was...you will still be charge guilty... but i agree, in most cases, as much as possible we should always choose the right thing to do for it will give a sweeter victory! have a nice day! :-)
1 person likes this
• India
2 Jul 09
Hi, JamieRose. You are certainly right in saying that the end can not justify the means. To your good thoughts, I would like add some of the views of mine. If you believe in good, then you should know that good never depends on bad, i.e. there are always another way of achieving the good goal rather than using the bad path. Also, all great personalities mention the goodnees of deeds is important, not the effect they produce, as from god, the effect of good deeds will automatically be good and bad ones culminate in evil (one such example comes from Jesus in The New Testament).
1 person likes this
@maharajb (17)
• Trinidad And Tobago
2 Jul 09
No I don't think that's okay. It's a bit tricky but,in a larger picture who are you? who am I? who is anyone else to decide who lives or die?That is a power we should not have.I think the line "the means justify the end", is a total copout and excuse to take no resposibilty for your actions.You brought up robinhood... now who was robin hood? the prince of THIEVES!! He was a thief, it don't matter if he did it for good, bottomline is, he was a thief.A person who kills is a murderer, A person who steals is a thief, a person who rapes is a rapist.There are no ifs, ands and buts involved. As far as I am concerned who the cap fits let them wear if. Now lets say you lie to a loved one to protect them,then you are liar.That is the underlying theme you are what you are, whether you did it for good or bad, you lied, so you a liar. We just use the means justify the end to ease our minds and guilt.So if someone steals to feed their family I have no problem with that,if I was to ever be in that position where I had to do that, I probably will steal, but dont deny the fact you are a thief, you stole something that did not belong to you.If you get caught don't say you not a thief, because guess what? You are!What I am trying to convey is take resposbility for your actions.Now lets just say for sake of an example: If I smoke pot, and someone calls me a "pothead", fine i am a pothead, I not going to make a million sob excuses to justify why I smoke. You get the drift of what I am saying? Whether good, bad or ugly your actions speak louder than your words and determine who you are.
1 person likes this
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
2 Jul 09
oh yes, yes i understand... so we really have no excuse in doing any crime, no matter what we do we should accept it and be responsible for it...and if there's law that is broken...let jury decide...but their decision can be against you or not even how good is your intention in doing so...everything depends on how the jury will perceive things... very nice point my friend... a crime is a crime no matter what your purpose or intention is... you can be charged guilty or get acquitted depends on the views and feelings of the juries... just accept and be responsible for your action and just wait for your verdict... but sometimes verdict went wrong due to person's different views and perceptions...but God always gives the fair judgement....
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
2 Jul 09
hello maharajb...very well said. thank you. i think you are right, no matter what our intention in doing such a thing...at the end we will still be charge as what we do...if we steal to feed our family then we are still a thief, if we kill just to depend ourselves or our loved ones...we are still a murderer?...that's life, we might be guilty for some cases but do you believe that in every rule there is an exemption? that's why there are some who gets acquitted in some crimes... thanks for sharing...its highly appreciated!
1 person likes this
• Trinidad And Tobago
2 Jul 09
No there is really and truly no exemption. You going into law now, and you are judged by a panel of your peers, and their verdict is based on their INTERPRETATION of the law. Their individual feelings and views also affect their decision. For example what is a threat to your family maybe not be viewed by me as a threat to mine.If someone looks at them crossed eye, is that a threat? point at them, is that a threat?Speaks to them loudly, is that a threat? And I could go on, based on interpretations of threat.I could go into now what is your interpretation of self defense, disarming a bandit and calling the police, disarming a bandit and then shooting him to prove a point?You understand.If I was on a jury now and your idea of a threat don't fit into mines, and I think you over reacted, what you think my verdict vote going to be?Not a good one!It not even about you getting found innocent or guilty, it about you committed an act and getting labelled as something, don't deny it, own it, be proud of it. You kill for your family be proud of it, "I killed for my family's safety". But remember you committed and act of killing someone, the name that goes with that act is a killer/murderer. Don't say "yes I shot the guy and killed him BUT you know I am not really a murderer "....oh yes you are one.You shot down another human being to defend your family, nothing wrong in that, I wouldn't think twice about doing it if my family was in danger.But I ain't going to make excuses,I would own it and be proud. "Sir I shot down that guy, I murdered him, took his life for my family to live in safety"It about you committing an act and afterwards owning up to it. Being proud of what you did, if someone has to lie to themselves about something they did to cope and feel less guilty, well then more times than not, they should have never done that act.
@skysuccess (8858)
• Singapore
2 Jul 09
ckyera, In the first place, I believe that today's world is nothing similar to the days of Sherwood Forest where we need folklore heroes like Robin Hood and his merry men to mete out justice and free the people from tyranny oppression. So, if we are going to "rob Peter to pay Paul", then it would be deemed that we have committed a crime. People today are given the same and fair opportunities to contribute to the well being of the society and we are already far from the primitive days. Hence, I am sure we can all be resourceful enough to earn a decent amount and contribute to the poor and destitute. In short, we just do not need to resort to a life of crime. As for mercy killing, there are just many considerations however, IMHO I feel that we do not have any right to even terminate our own lives. Like it or not, I feel that we should live life to the fullest and taking one step at a time with our faith and courage. The end does justify the means provided we do things in a humane, legal and moral manner. Our world today just does not require anyone to break or be above the law to achieve any ends. It is a open and fair world where we just have to be sane and objective. Cheers.
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
2 Jul 09
hi skysuccess... thanks for your very nice thought... so what you mean is the end does justify the mean as long as nobody is hurt? and as long as it don't suppress anyone's rights? but what if a situation calls that you have to do a mean, mean just to get the good end? or will it be really possible to have a good end with a bad mean? thanks again....
1 person likes this
@pickoy (733)
• Philippines
2 Jul 09
No it doesn't. You can never straighten a curved line by drawing another curved line or fix a mistake by making another mistake. No one can justify a lie by another lie in time you'll be weaving a dangerous web for yourself. I must admit I do lie at times for the thought that it can do good to some friend or family member but why does it hurt when I lie? It mean's there's something off about it... Euthanasia can be a comfortable resort for some people, but I personally don't think that its the only way... Our instincts always dictate us to survive and live, that's our natural reaction to danger which is why when we're in the water we try so hard to gasp for air... but to kill someone at their worst case I don't think I can do that no matter how hard that person asks me. I will be there for him, to comfort him but I won't answer to his plea. If by any case the person is incapacitated to speak,like those in comma, who am I do decide if its the end of the line... It's a very hard decision to make specially if you've lost all your properties trying to save someone who's in the comma for months or years... and its a pain that I'll carry for years... you know that if you continue to support someone in comma you'll get bankrupt in time and I'm sure he also doesn't want that to happen to his loved ones... they lost a loved one and they lost all their properties... I never really want that kind of situation and I never wish to even come across that coz I still don't know the answer to that. In case of robinhood, it's wrong in every sense... there are so many ways to help the poor... but to take the money from another devil is inviting trouble to his case.
• India
2 Jul 09
Sometimes it does sometimes it doesnot . If the ends make somebody happy without damaging or jeopardizing anyone else's life then I believe there is no harm in engaging in bit of lying or foul play . But if the ends are farther one's vested interests then it is Machiavellian and that is wrong . You come across such people in organizations where they are willing to do anything to climb the corporate . I beleieve that is unethical and plainly wrong
1 person likes this
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
2 Jul 09
i think so, you have a point there...yes as long as you don't hurt anyone in doing so, then it will be fine...but most of the time in this cases we tend to hurt somebody even if its not our intention to hurt them, sometimes a small lie we do can lead to a bigger trouble...so we can really never tell coz not everybody can understand our acts... thanks for sharing sauman!
1 person likes this
• United States
2 Jul 09
I believe in karma in a big way. On the other hand is someone stealing bread to feed his children a bad person? As long as you have a good reason as to why you are doing something right or wrong it is justified.
1 person likes this
• United States
1 Jul 09
In some situations, yes. I don't think you can just make a general statement of yes or no. Each situation should be looked at individually.
1 person likes this
@ckyera (17331)
• Philippines
2 Jul 09
really depends on the situation...huh! thanks!
1 person likes this