Exams: Open-book or closed-book?

@kevchua (1004)
Malaysia
July 17, 2009 10:22am CST
The university in which I'm currently teaching is planning to implement an open-book exam throughout the campus. I believe that this method of assessment calls for a change in the way questions are designed and administered. I'd like some input from those who have experienced an open-book exam. What are the problems, and what are the benefits?
1 person likes this
12 responses
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
22 Jul 09
The examination is not the time for research. The purpose of the examination is to measure the student's mastery of the subject. An open-book exam is defeating the purpose of student preparedness. A student can always resort to saying "Okay, I won't review that anymore. It's open book anyway." Consulting the book is also a hindrance to a speedy mental process required in answering the test. If I remember right, in a one hour examination, twenty minutes must be allotted for the student to read and think about the questions. The rest of the time must be given for the actual writing of the answers. In an open-book exam, how much time will be given to consulting the book?
@eileenleyva (27560)
• Philippines
23 Jul 09
I still don't see what good an open-book exam may bring. But the university can experiment and study the effects on the students. If it is for the betterment of each and everyone, why not? We won't know till we try.
@kevchua (1004)
• Malaysia
22 Jul 09
Yes, eileenleyva...examination is not the time for research. In an open-book exam, students are supposed to refer certain pages only, not the entire book. That means they must know where to look for the answers. That also means if they hardly study, they won't know where to look. Generally, open-book exams for core subjects would take more than an hour. In the university where I teach, that's 2 hours or 3 hours depending on the paper/subject. Obviously, this open-book exam will not benefit those who hope to roll a dice for the answer, and those who merely memorise like parrots. :) It has been a great discussion. I hope more people would contribute so that we could learn from each other.
1 person likes this
• United States
20 Jul 09
I always loved giving open-booked tests. I had to word questions differently so that it would make the student really dig for the answer and have to thnk about it. I used lots of comparison questions rather than like simple definitions and such. I think the goal is for the student to attain the information however they get it. It will be a change on the professor's part to make the tests challenging.
• United States
21 Jul 09
Yes, at first it is more difficult to write the questions. After awhile it gets kinda fun actually. It is a challenge to word them so that the answers are a little more difficult to achieve. It does get easier to think that way though. I also use the same type of method for writing study guides for Bible studies!
@kevchua (1004)
• Malaysia
21 Jul 09
Yes, it's true. An open-book exam or OBE entails a lot more work on the part of the teacher as it requires thinking how to ask questions that make students think and apply what they have learnt. Our university is in the process of trying out the OBE but I'm unsure how it's going to work for English. Was it difficult for you to design the questions? Did you have to attend a workshop on how to create questions for OBE? What problems did you face while doing the questions, and have your students been ok with this type of assessment rather than the traditional closed-book exam? Sorry, too many questions but I find this discussion interesting as it relates to my work, and to what the establishment is going to do in the new semester. Thanks :)
19 Sep 09
The problem is, students will rely themselves (during examination) on their books, because basicly you can find (almost) all information from the related book. The main aim of examination is to force the students to think. =) Do you agree with me? So, if the open book system is implemented, I don't think it helps student fulfilling the aim of study itself. How about your opinion ?
@pengbubu (1011)
• China
21 Jul 09
I like open-book exam better, because it's always easy to pass the exam. So I can have fun and don't have to study hard. Some times the exam is very hard even it's open-book, because we can hardly find a direct answer from the book, this kind of exam is our last favorite. Because we don't know we should study hard till the exam starts, not like the closed-book exam. In closed book exam, we know that we should study hard before exam if we want to pass the exam. And now I am not a student any longer, I don't have to take exams like students before. Above is my feeling about the exam.
@kevchua (1004)
• Malaysia
22 Jul 09
Taking exams is not about answering easy questions to get good scores. The whole purpose of taking an exam is to assess if students have understood what has been taught,and if they are able to apply theories, concepts or formulas in real situations. If students expect questions to be easy all the time, then not much of learning could take place. When we study hard, we are able to (hopefully) understand the contents. Therefore, in the exam, you'll be able to answer the questions rather easily though there could be a couple of tricky of mind-bending questions, which are in fact good if you could attempt to answer. It is hoped that students study hard to pass the exams and not merely hope for easy questions. Cheers! :)
@jshekhar (1562)
• India
17 Jul 09
Hello friend, I think open book examinations are fine if the time limit is suitable. Because, even with open book system, you still have to be through with the contents of the book, as you would not have time in examinations to search for a particular topic in index and then look up the relevant pages there.Students might feel that they do not need to study in such a system but it is not that. Nice thought, Cheers!
@kevchua (1004)
• Malaysia
17 Jul 09
In an exam, a candidate is supposed to be prepared with answers. In an open-book exam, you need to know which page (or at least the chapter) to refer, or else you'd be spending more time referring than answering questions. I'd like to hear from someone (a teacher or a student) who has actually gone through this process. How was it implemented, and was it successful? Did it make students better learners? How does it affect the teachers in terms of designing the questions?
@kevchua (1004)
• Malaysia
17 Jul 09
By the way jshekhar, thanks for the comment. Appreciate that :)
• Philippines
17 Jul 09
I am ok with open-book policy when it is exam time as long as it will be time-pressured and questions are hard to answer.
@kevchua (1004)
• Malaysia
17 Jul 09
Yup, that's right. It's definitely going to be tough questions but there must be guidelines as to how these questions should be designed, too. We don't want everyone to fail, do we? What are these guidelines, that's what I want to know, too :) Hey, thanks. Good comment :)
• Indonesia
18 Jul 09
Each method of assessment has its own advantages and disadvantages. For open-book exam, I think that both the teachers and the students have to think harder. Teachers should think how to make good questions that the answers can't be found easily just by reading the textbook. Students will have more difficulties in doing the exam because even though they can open the textbook, they still have to think deeply, analize everything they read to find the most correct answer for each question.
@abenitez (501)
• United States
17 Jul 09
Open book exams are not bad, you would still have to study because the questions will be harder than on a closed book exam. I have had open book exams at my university before and they were actually harder than closed book exams. Too many people think that it will be very easy and dont study, then they spend too much time looking for the answer rather than answering the questions.
@faisai (1138)
• Hong Kong
17 Jul 09
Open-book exams are more focused on the logics rather than the data so it depends whether the focus is to test the candidate's memory on the data side or the logics where reference to the data is not the key. I have taken some open-book exams before where opening the book is really not that helpful because it is more open-ended questions where data is not the key to "correct" answers... In fact there are really no model answers.
@colydf (913)
• China
24 Jul 09
In our university, there are both open-book exams and closed-book exams, according to different exams. For example, if it is management, we will have open-book exams, because for course like this, there is no need to closed-book, open-book will help us to really comprehend the course.
• India
19 Jul 09
the open book may not be as simple as it looks because ones the exam start it is difficult to find the particular topic and it will also depend on the memory based exam and first start with index and end with last page of the text book and we cant not skip a word from text book if we have this kind of exam. and i tell you it will be very difficult to read the fat book with 3000 pages in it.
• Cyprus
18 Jul 09
Open books are more challenging, which is something i like. With an open-book exam the questions will definitely be on a whole new level and at my uni an open book exam is an excuse used to incorporate really tricky/difficult questions without coming off as a strict professor.