Were the police right to shoot the homeowner with the gun?

in some cases you have to take into account that the police are acting under pressure and in dangerous conditions. however here it does look like the police were thoroughly in the wrong and this should have led to disciplinary action and more importantly to providing better training for the police in the first place. do you have a link to an article on this one?

The police is wrong since the homeowner has identified himself. And shouldn't the police try to talk to the suspect first and try to calm them down with the hopes that they don't shoot? Or are those in the movies only? lol.

We have the right to bear arms here in the United States, and we have the right to protect ourselves and to protect our family. I think that the police were in the wrong in this instance. and they should not have gotten off with nothing.

wow, do my eyes deceive me, am i reading this right? Let me get this straight. An organization, created by the united states government, to serve the public and protect the people. That was given the power to do as they wish whenever they want, with little or no consequence. Was called into action, to do their job, by protecting a family that was being robbed. Had shown up to do their job, IE: protect the family and remove the offender. Did it wrong. By shooting the home owner, who called them in the first place because him and his family were in danger, and was acting on his constitutional right to own a fire arm, and had already subdued the actual criminal in the situation. The home owner stated above, was shot by said organization, and said organization, was not punished for that action. This is utterly disgusting, and it goes to show what people can get away with, but all i can say is. Welcome to the United States of America.