The meaning of "punk"
By olisaur
@olisaur (1922)
United States
May 20, 2010 4:27pm CST
I don't know if any mylotters have noticed but the usage of the term "punk" has come to the point where it is way over-used- abused, in my opinion.
Original punk music consisted of something like simple-ish power chord/chord riffs, fast beats, lyrics with political statements and HARD, scream-y vocals.
Today's "punk" is anything mainstream-rock.
I was at the record store the other day, and I came across these "Punk goes Classic Rock," "Punk goes Crunk" etc. (where bands cover songs of a different genre). Some of those songs are fun and catchy, but it's NOT punk-punk.
These new bands dubbed "punk" are more pop-rock, with upbeat music, lovesick lyrics and vocals with that valley-girl accent. Rather than punksters moshing to this music, teen-age girls would scream and dance to it.
I listened to some of the "Punk goes Classic Rock" CD online, and Crazy Train is one of the tracks (I must say, that cover is pretty wimpy). I wasn't impressed by most of them, except the "We Are the Champions" cover was kind of fun.
Whatever. I'm really annoyed by people calling everything "punk rock," so I just thought I'd mention it.
1 person likes this
2 responses
@bmodlin (14)
• United States
20 May 10
This is something that drives me nuts! "Punk" has become so trendy and poppy. I hate seeing 'Avril Laveigne' ..or whatever her name is under the "punk" section of music stores. Punk to me is rebelling against all the trends. Punk to me is bands such as Iggy Pop, Lou Reed, The Clash, The Avengers, and so on. Punk to me isn't just a costume, its a way of life.
1 person likes this