you dont need to be a politician to help

Philippines
May 27, 2010 8:28pm CST
funny to see here in our country (Philippines) there are a lot of popular people specially in show business ran for office and to my surprise most of them won. mostly actors and actress. but to think of it, if they really want to help they dont need to ran for office. angelina jolie she is U.N. goodwill ambassador, is one example of helping that need not to be a politician. they can build their own foundation and help. michael jackson is a good example also of helping people around the world. i am proud to say that here in our city of Marikina Philippines there were no actor or actress that won for office. not because i am against of this actors and actress its just for me if they want to help they dont need to be a politician.
1 person likes this
16 responses
@kharlav (1669)
• Philippines
28 May 10
Yes, that's right. A person don't need to run for office to help. A person should not have big things if he can't even handle or won't do small things. WHat I mean is, if a person could not even help in smaller things, like give offer/give things to the poor, give food; then he shouldn't run in politics claiming that he wants to help the people, because I know for sure that he wouldn't.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
1 Jun 10
very well said khar. if he can not help from getting from his own money then why will we trust him with the money of the country. that is why there are more corrupt politician than ones who are sincere. thanks a lot for the response it was a great way to explain it.
@TheAdvocate (2392)
• Philippines
28 May 10
Well, we did have that has-been actor who won in a previous election (whose name escapes me now). There are not a lot of actors who live here in Marikina, unlike in Makati and Quezon City. :-) I do agree with you that you do not need to be a politician in order to help. I think showbiz folks are addicted to fame and politics is another way of hiding behind lofty ideals while still feeding their ego. Politics seem to be the refuge of the has-been in their bid to stay in the limelight.
1 person likes this
• Philippines
29 May 10
now our response catches my attention. maybe thats the reason why they are running for politics, for they are addicted to fame. har har har politics is the refuge of the has been now thats one good reason. thanks a lot for the response
@grayxenon (1313)
• Philippines
28 May 10
Partly you are right, but remember that having a position and a power to boot is an advantage for helping a wider sector of the population without hurting your own pocket, let's face it helping others is a financial vacuum that will eat all your earnings. Well, you can argue that it doesn't matter how small your deeds are, but some what to put a larger scale of picture. Just like pacquiao, i don't like the idea of him running for an office especially a congressman, but i understand what his intention are, being a congressman a pork barrel with millions on it will help a wider sector thru government projects, if properly allocated. I am not against actors/ actress running for position in the government because some has genuinely intentions to help further. I vote not for occupation of association, i vote for qualifications and intentions..
• Philippines
1 Jun 10
yes i do have nothing against any celebrity. for some of then was doing their job really for the people. but some are questionable. there are celebrities who made their own foundation and help no need to grab at the seat on political arena. in pacquiao's case we have to sit and watch. i hope he is better in congress just like he is at the arena. thanks a lot for the response.
• Philippines
28 May 10
IN our case, they need other jobs to go attend to since they're not as popular as they use to be. look at Ara Mina how can she run for public if she doesn't know major issues of the country, and probably doing so because her father is a politician. there are other Celebrities there that doesn't need to run for politics, but they can help a lot, why run when they help charities or Ngo supported by other celebrities as well. government positions, may it be legislative or executive is a serious work. i don't even understand why manny pacman won but he isn't present in the joint canvassing
• Philippines
29 May 10
there, pacman is a good example, and as well as ara mina. did ara won? i mean there are also ex-celebrity who ran for office but we all know that they are doing this since they are teens. for example herbert bautista he joined sangguniang kabataan during his teen years and from that he had level up already and now is the city mayor of quezon city. that is impressing for he is doing this all his life. since he was a teen. the one that is confusing me is the case of richard gomez and lucy torres. thanks a lot for the response
• Philippines
1 Jun 10
that got me thinking WHAT ON EARTH is LUCY'S track record as a Politician.
• Philippines
2 Jun 10
thats exactly my point. i know her father is a politician there at ormok but lucy? and the thing that really is a puzzle for me is richard gomez was the one who was running for office at ormok then he was disqualified. then because he is disqualified they put lucy instead. but as they say the person who will sit in office is richard under lucy's name. WHAT? i am really confused now on election rules in our country. this &uck!!!
• Boston, Massachusetts
28 May 10
I agree with you 7th. Anybody can help people whoever you and whatever status you have in the society. Rich and poor have the capacity to help others in their own simple and unique way. If you want to help then by all means you can. No need to wait to be in the political arena to be of help. …though like you I am not against these actors and actresses politicians or turned- politicians as there are who are really performing well, but how about the others?
• Philippines
1 Jun 10
yes there are celebrities who really perform well like herbert bautista that he started in a sangguniang kabataan when he was a teen, and from then on became a serious politician. the questionable for me are like ara mina, jobelle salvador, richard gomez (that was disqualified then lucy ran but she was very visible on tv during campaign... that was a big question for me) i mean if i were an actor then i can use my connection to help people. just look at noynoy... who help him in his campaign... celebrities. thanks a lot for the response
1 person likes this
• Boston, Massachusetts
1 Jun 10
hehehehe...let's give them a chance to shine in their own simple way. who knows they have the caliber to lead that will surprise us. i will be on the look out friend.
• Philippines
28 May 10
I'm not against actors and actresses winning in politics. I'm against frauds who win but are not really deserving. These actors run cuz they know they can help more easily if they're a politician. Sure they can help without being one but it's not as easy to do it.
@grayxenon (1313)
• Philippines
28 May 10
Yeah you are right, agreed totally, and we should stop comparing philippines to other countries, especially the US, because actors running in public is a common thing in every country, look who's the governor of California..
@webzap (884)
• Philippines
28 May 10
No matter who you are as long as your heart is telling you to help, everybody can do help. Reaching out to the poor and not so fortunate is always in the mind of some of us especially the church. We, the parishioners of Immaculate Conception Church used to collect some grocery items and once enough is accumulated, then it's a go go go and distribute it to the needy especially at the home of the aged.
• Philippines
29 May 10
yes that is very true. now this made me think why not this popular people join in a community like this and help. why do they have to be politicians then promise the public that they will help them. helping need not to be put on news paper but it has to be from the heart. thanks a lot for the response and good job web.
@lampar (7584)
• United States
29 May 10
That is a misconception any man or woman choose to be a politician is because want to help others, i just don't know how you get that idea. You are right that you don't need to be a politician to help but a politician choose what he /she want to be is because of the public office that guarantee high social status, and stable future income and perks in U.S government. Nobody here choose to become a politician because he/she is eager to help others; if that is the case, he will become a salvation army stuffer or preacher or an entertainer; but not as a politician. haha....it is just a propaganda from a political party that politician want to help to fish for vote.
@JenInTN (27514)
• United States
29 May 10
LOL..we have had a couple of actors voted into politics here too. It is funny at first. One of our presidents was actually an actor! President Ronald Reagan was in a lot of movies..he usually played a cowboy..lol..then there is Arnold in California right now. Terminator star.
• Philippines
28 May 10
I'm not against actors and actresses winning in politics. I'm against frauds who win but are not really deserving. These actors run cuz they know they can help more easily if they're a politician. Sure they can help without being one but it's not as easy to do it.
• Philippines
1 Jun 10
i too am not against any celebrity for some of them made a great job while in office but some of them just created a circus in their new found careers. its the people who suffer and the country as well. i just hope that they are serious when they have a seat. thanks a lot for the response
• Philippines
28 May 10
There are a lot of ways to reach out to those less fortunate. There is no need to be a politician nor a celebrity. Sometimes these are just tag lines to those who are running for public office to get symphaty from people. Everybody is capable of helping. It only requires a heart and great sincerity. Public service is not only done by people who are popular, we can be of help in our own little ways.
• Philippines
29 May 10
welcome to the wonderful world of mylor rhaze hope to see you here more and good luck. yes even us ordinary people can help, but my wonder is why celebrity do have to run office and their main priority is to help people as what they say. being a celebrity makes a whole lot of difference than being in politics. they always say in their campaign that they want to help people, that their intentions are clean. fine, granting that is true but why not help people while you are earning big in show business. thanks a lot for the response
@xeroeight (1060)
• Philippines
28 May 10
You are right, there's no need to be a politician to help others that in need, just like some known media personnel they help less fortunate people by giving and providing food and school supply,
• Philippines
29 May 10
yes xero, i guess a celebrity can help more for they are popular so they dont need to be in politics to give a helping hand. i guess some people does not like to loss their shine thats why they jump in a more complicated ride. thanks a lot for the response
@iristacey (112)
• Philippines
28 May 10
I totally agree. However, there are people who use this alibi to run for a political post whereas at the back of their mind, they are wanting the position for their personal interest, especially for their finances. Historically, showbiz personalities use politics as their fallback. Although this is not a guarantee for them to win, it works as an advantage because of name recall. But the fact remains, they can help without running into a political position.
• Singapore
28 May 10
I don't care who they are, just as long as I agree with their views and trust their decisive skills I will vote for them, whats the point in looking at their previous jobs and such, I've seen police officers commit crime. Chill out.
• India
28 May 10
its not your country, its all the countries blindly Dependant on the politician to get the help done to the required, its very important that wherever we can reach our help we should be first to help rather than waiting for the government to do the job
@jamed28 (1903)
• Philippines
28 May 10
It is really hard to fine now a days, a politician, who's primary purpose of seeking an office in the government, is to serve. If you will only do the Math. with the amount of money they are using in campaign versus the amount of salary and allowances that they will receive if ever they win the election. It will really cost a lot for a politician just to have a sit in the government. But as we all know most politicians that we have are the rich and famous, and they are even becoming more richer while in government office. Corruption in this country is very much obvious, let's stop pointing fingers on those people because it will not solve this problem.