What are your arguments against conspiracy theorists?

China
November 16, 2006 9:12pm CST
What are your arguments against conspiracy theorists? I am a conspiracy theorist - and proud of it. I read many of the anti-conspiracy theory arguments, and every so often, I come across a well written argument which causes me to think about my position. There is an anti-conspiracy theory on almost every subject, but when we try to put these anti-theories together, there is no coherence. We end up with many disjointed events with no real meaning or significance. When one understands just how big the conspiracy is, then almost all world events can be understood as a part of a complete world take-over. The big picture is coherent, and fits like a glove to the conspirators MO. I am trying to find an anti-conspiracy theory which ties together the following world events. - 9/11 - The Iraq war - 7/7 - the London bombings - The Madrid train bombing - The Bali bombing - The Lockerbie air disaster - Private ownership of the Federal Reserve - The illegal IRS in America - The manipulation and restriction in the health industry - The illegality of marijuana - The flouridation of water - The proliferation of vaccinations - The manipulation of the mass media - Electronic voting machine fraud - The war on Terror - The new concentration camps in America - The North American Union - The Franklin Cover-up - The use of depleted uranium - MK-Ultra - Chemtrails. - Micro-chip identification. - The disappearance of microbiologists. - The massive increase in cancer Aids and diabetes. - The ignominious continued use of the internal combustion engine. - The lack of research into alternative energy. - The lack of interest in global warming - The insistence on corporate matters and globalisation - The suppression of alternative medicine. - The lack of meaningful education in schools and universities. and a host of others. In the anti-conspiracy theory there is no corelation between the above events, which means that the number of people manipulating the world must be in the thousands, with no relationship to each other. This makes no sense at all. By considering the known agenda of the New World Order, all of the above fall under the same umbrella, givng a coherent understanding of world events. No matter how much I try, I find myself unable to be rid of the idea that the world is controlled by a small bunch of very rich evil families, who are bent on total world dominance, populatioon reduction, and total control of the remaining surviving inhabitants. I would like anyone who claims that there is no conspiracy to provide a coherent explanation of the above.
1 person likes this
5 responses
• United States
28 Nov 06
There is most definitely a conspiracy going on. The most logical reason anyone would give for doubting this fact is that in admitting the existence of a conspiracy means they are also powerless to stop it. This could not be further from the truth. Knowledge is indeed power, and with the knowledge of a conspiracy comes the duty of acting to fight the conspiracy, despite widespread belief of a lack of conspiracy. It is amazing what even one individual can do in standing for the cause of good in the world.
• China
28 Nov 06
I agree completely. You obviously understand the reason for the question!! Best response - congratulations.
@TDonald (1421)
• United States
17 Nov 06
An explanation for your list... Some world systems are broken and the some people are deranged. That's the one thing that ties them together. Blaming it on some secret organization is not taking responsibility for the conditions we've collectively created and allow to continue. Fundamental Religionists, Racists, Overactive Imagination, and Money expains almost everything on the list.
• China
18 Nov 06
Sounds like a perfect description of the Zionists of the New World Order. Fundamental religionists, who believe they have a right to rule the world, racists, in that they believe that are the chosen people, overactive imagination, in that they belive that we will all bow down to them, and yes, they are vthe wealthiest people on the planet, owning the Federal Reservs, most of the mass media, and most banks, alolng with most of the corporations.
@TDonald (1421)
• United States
20 Nov 06
So we agree on that. Still you don't need elaborate conspiracy theories to explain what is happening in the world. Occam's Razor says that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible. This is often paraphrased as "All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the best one." The simplest solution here is basically GREED.
@brentjh (677)
• Namibia
23 Nov 06
I don't have anything against conspiracy theorists. In fact I enjoy the way they think out of the box. It gives you a different perspetive of things. Some conspiracie theories are not nessesary correct. But for example the 911 attacks and the pentagon story. There is definately no plane involved there. I saw that immediatly on TV. A question to ask of course is "why do conspiracy theories even exist?" Answer "Because governments exist that can't be trusted!" Yes well... name me one trustworthy government in the world!" There is'nt one!
• China
23 Nov 06
I agree. Governments are in place only as a means of carrying on the agenda of the Illuminati, and to give citizens the misconception that some form of democracy exists.
@TDonald (1421)
• United States
17 Nov 06
Against... there are few people, especially in government who can keep a secret when there is money involved. The bottom line is always money.
• China
17 Nov 06
The top of the heap are people like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, The Pope (or a representative), The Queen if England. You can get some idea by watching the Kay Griggs interviews. There are over 8 hours of interwiews available, but a start can be made at http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmithInterviewsKayGriggs.html
@dhn1975 (91)
• United States
30 Dec 06
It's good to question your position. It makes us re-evaluate our perspective on life, but for the mean time, I remain a conspiracy theorist, but it's not as if you can do anything about it. Are we conspiray theorists any different than the non-conspiracy theorists in terms of behavior? Not really. I'm sure you've read about Pavlov's experiments on his dogs which resulted in conditioning. Do people really believe they're so different? The only difference between pavlov's dogs and people is that the dogs responded to the bell. People respond to paper/money. Isn't that why we're here? Mylot is paying us. Hehe.