There Must Be a Supreme Person

Tweet

Friends, some philosophers argue that there cannot be a supreme person, but that argument is not at all logical. To say that there is no supreme person is another way of saying that we are all equally situated, which is clearly not the case. We can see that all over the world persons possess different quantities of this opulence: power, beauty, renunciation, knowledge, wealth, and fame. It is not that everybody possesses the same amount of this opulence. So somewhere within all of existence there must a person who possesses a greater quantity of this opulence than anyone else. That person is the Supreme Person. No l scientists, logicians, and philosophers can prove that such a person does not exist. Since each person possesses a different amount of this opulence, there has to be somewhere a Supreme Person. To know Him and love Him is the perfection of our existence. If one would like to know who He is, what He looks like, where He lives, and what He does, you have to go to the right guru, the right guide. This becomes more evident as we grow older and more mature. What is your view on this? Professor