Why is Jury Duty Mandatory if it is a Civil Liberty?

United States
November 17, 2010 6:07pm CST
After receiving my jury duty summons, I read through the 4 page propaganda booklet looking for questions about the actual procedure of how to be in compliance with the summons. Instead, I found a huge Q&A about why I should be honored and privileged to be on a jury, and what happened if I din't accept this honor and privilege. Warrant, Jail and Fine were used liberally throughout. After actually showing up for my first of 7 appearances, I listened to the bailiff explain how they had to select from DMV users instead of registered voters as jury duty selection was causing people to avoid registering to vote. So my question is if they understand how reluctant people are to being a juror, why don't they increase the incentives? Jurors receive as much for pay in one day of service as many people make in an hour. With as much money circulating through our legal system, are we expected to believe $10-$15/day is the best they can muster? If they want people to get interested in jury duty, why don't they have the lawyers and judge each contribute an hour of their salary to compensating jurors? Juror Compensation rates - http://www.matrixbookstore.biz/trial_jury.htm
1 person likes this
1 response
• United States
18 Nov 10
I totally agree with you. If they increased the incentives people would not mind serving as much. Like you said, a day of pay for being a juror is pathetic. It amounts to nothing. Imagine how things would change if lawyers and judges had to contribute!
• United States
19 Nov 10
Definitely. The lawyers might think twice about the jurors they select if they have a personal vested interest in ensuring that justice is done, instead of selling the case