I'd be nice if this book would mention that this was "X" in a series.
By megamatt
@megamatt (14292)
United States
February 10, 2011 8:33pm CST
There are a few times where I read a book and I am confused. Upon further investigation, it appears to be a book that is a bit along in a series. You would think that would be obvious on the front cover and to be fair, there are some books that are in fact like that. Yet there are some that don't make it all too clear. Maybe a small note a few pages into the book but I'll be honest, when I pick up a book, I'm really only looking at the front cover and a summary that might be on the back. So have you ever been caught off guard by this?
1 person likes this
5 responses
@GreenMoo (11834)
•
12 Feb 11
This has caught me out many times, and it's really frustrating. Sometimes it's not a problem as the individual books can be read as stand alones and you can sort of fill in the gaps in the background story and history as you go along, but other times it's a big handicap to enjoying them.
I think the problem is that when the first of second book in a series, for instance, is originally published, they aren't yet part of a series. But often you have to search in the 'other books by the same author' page inside to find out the information, which does strike me as stupid. It strikes me as an extra sales opportunity for the publisher!
@GreenMoo (11834)
•
14 Feb 11
I like the Harlan Coben Myron Bolitar books (yeah, I'm a pulp detective novels sorta gal!) but I've never found that reading them out of sequence detracts from them as they stand alone so well. By contrast, I read The Girl Who Played with Fire (the second in the series, the first being The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo) recently and thought I really missed out by having not read the first. Oddly though, it was the way that the first story was alluded to within the second that made me feel as if I was missing something rather than anything that was actually missing from the plot. A weird one, worth thinking about all you writers out there who are writing a second or third book based on the same characters!
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
14 Feb 11
Yeah I do agree. There are a few series out there that really were not intended to be in a series of books at first. It is just something that really grew into a series at a later time. Therefore it is not marked as such. Still how many people would think to look at the other works by author. At least until they get home and start reading the book. Thank you for your response. It is much appreciated and it contributed to the topic well. Have a nice day and thanks.
@allyoftherain (7208)
• United States
12 Feb 11
I haven't been caught off guard by it recently. I've been duped before so I tend to look all over the book to see if I can try and find any information about it being in a series.
The ones I really hate are when it's kinda footnoted in the author's bio that this is a series, but I can't find a number or a list of the books anywhere on the book. I'd prefer they were clearly marked with a number.
Also, when I do find a number it always seems like the bookstore never has #1.
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
14 Feb 11
I do find that rather amusing. The bookstore never really does seem to have number one a lot of the time. Or if I'm at the library, that just happens to be the one book that has been all checked out. Of course, I can always go online and order it, but still, its the principle of the matter that counts. Thank you for your response. It is much appreciated and it contributed to the topic well. Have a nice day and thanks.
1 person likes this
@allyoftherain (7208)
• United States
15 Feb 11
I really prefer getting the book at the bookstore. I don't like online shopping nearly as much. It's no fun for me! I only online shop when I can't find the book I'm looking for anywhere else.
The libraries are a culprit too. lol Doesn't anyone other than Amazon have the first book?
@gloryacam (5540)
• Philippines
11 Feb 11
Yes, once, I think. And around the middle of the novel, I realized I was amiss about something, and at the end, I realized that it is a part of a series. It didn't bother me that much but now I have to search for the other books. Dang. And I found this book just at a book sale. All others I've read, I knew that they're in a series, so I almost always had to look for the first book (Type A personality )
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
11 Feb 11
Yes, I'm like that too. I really do need the entire story. If the author is good enough, they will bring you up to speed. However, that really does not matter. I want to see the entire story. Therefore I look up any book or books that might have been written previously in a series. Just to see how the story has evolved if anything else. Thank you for your response. It is much appreciated and it contributed to the topic well. Have a nice day and thanks.
@Pinkie2011 (64)
• United States
28 Feb 11
I have had that happen to me before.I was reading a book I thought looked and sounded really cool by the summary and I opened it up and read a little.Well, turns out it was number three in the series.I didn't find that out until I looked at the first couple of pages when I started to read it.It was still a good book even though I was confused a little when reading it.Well a little while later I got almost all the books in the series so I started reading the first one and I thought oh now I get it.But the series is so awesome.It's the Cynster series. Awesome!
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
28 Feb 11
Sometimes you can stumble upon a good series by this thing, as if you have indicated. And if the author does a good enough job, then it should not really be too jarring and you'll just go with the flow, before picking up the previous books to fill in whatever blanks that you have in your head. Still does bug me just a little bit. Thank you for responding. It is appreciated. Have a nice day.
@curtangel (108)
• United States
11 Feb 11
Yes, I've had that happen a couple of times. I think if an author is writing in a series where its not numbered or obvious that's its part of a continuing story they should make it so the story stands on its own without the rest of the series. Unfortunately not all authors do.
One of the worst examples of this I've seen is Patricia Cronwell's Blowfly. I'm actually something of a fan of her work in general, but this book was the first I read and it pretty much REQUIRED you know what was going on in the series to understand it.
Publishers are probably a big part of it, after all they want you to see the book on the shelf and pick it up and buy it, not look at it briefly and then go "I'll buy it after I read the previous 5 books". It's a bit of short term thinking on their part but... there you go.
@megamatt (14292)
• United States
11 Feb 11
Yeah I think that they really should if they are not going to bother to label them. Although to be fair, I think that is more of a fault of the publishing company that puts out the book then the writer. Of course, some people(like me) might see that it is a certain book in the series and then purchase all the previous books should they be there, so really, you're getting the profit from more then one book. So I do agree that it is short term thinking for sure. Thank you for your response. It is much appreciated and it contributed to the topic well. Have a nice day and thanks.