Passive or interactive - what kind of novel do you prefer?
By Awinds
@Awinds (2468)
United States
October 16, 2011 6:33pm CST
Your typical novel is by one or two authors. It will be words on a print or virtual page. The words make a story. The plot is set in stone and the reader has no influence over its development. The reader just...reads. This is the traditional type of novel.
However in the last few decades there has been a new kind of novel: the interactive novel. This category is quite broad. An interactive novel can be the readers communicating to the author which way they want the story to go or it can be the readers writing the novels themselves. Interactive novels can also have many different directions and endings depending on how the reader navigates. Interactive novels can also include links, videos, games etc.
So which kind of novel do you prefer? Interactive or traditional and passive? Do you think the traditional novel will survive is interactivity in the future for all novels?
3 people like this
12 responses
@enelym001 (8322)
• Philippines
17 Oct 11
I guess I haven't read an Interactive novel yet... can you give us a sample of it please so that we can check how it differs from the traditional one. Is Harry Potter one example of an Interactive novel.
For me, I would prefer the typical traditional novel. I love how these stories were made and I guess it becomes interactive too when you think of how the story would end. Although you have no choice what ending you want it to have. But the thrill of having to wonder what if the ending would be on my way and not the author's way is something that I enjoy in novels.
1 person likes this
@enelym001 (8322)
• Philippines
17 Oct 11
I checked on the link you gave, and I found it really new. I might check it out again some other time just to see how it really works.
@estherlou (5015)
• United States
17 Oct 11
The interactive novel would take more time, and also takes some effort. I like to read for entertainment, not have to work. If I wanted to help write the book, I'd just write one. And I'd probably never get finished with the story. Wouldn't quite be the same.They'd probably go in the direction of virtual reality entertainment or "holodecks" ala Star Trek.
1 person likes this
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
17 Oct 11
That's another key point. Would authors really be willing to write potential twice or thrice as much story as they did before? And you bring up another example: reading for a lot of people is also about relaxing and getting lost in another world. Videos and puzzles impede on that process. If one wanted a narrative with these "enhancements" then surely one would just play a video game.
@a_year_older (636)
• Malaysia
24 Oct 11
I'm not quite sure I understand what you meant by interactive novels. Were you referring to books like Goosebumps where there are alternate endings depending on the choices you made at the end of each chapter?
Either way I think I'd prefer your "passive" stories more. Sure all the readers do is just read but the reader is allowed to imagine the possibilities of what will happen while reading before getting to the end of the story. While you may get disappointed with how the writer ends it, I think it's still nice to have felt the thrill while reading.
@a_year_older (636)
• Malaysia
25 Oct 11
Oh I haven't come across any interactive fiction then. Is there one you can recommend me? I'd like to try and see if I like it.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
24 Oct 11
Goosebumps would be one example. That is usually (from my experience) what interactive fiction is. One has choices throughout the story that altar the plot line. However interactive fiction is an umbrella term that covers books that include music or video as well.
Passive is the traditional type of novel that has text and chapters and maybe some cover art on the cover. I do agree that this kind of novel allows the read to use their imagination - it what makes reading a great experience. :)
@celticeagle (167025)
• Boise, Idaho
18 Oct 11
I would have to go with the passive. Haven't experienced any interactive stuff but have heard of it. I did email an author and told her what I thought of her book. That was nice as I had wished I could do something like it in the past. I hope the traditional novel will survive as I am yet to publish mine.
@celticeagle (167025)
• Boise, Idaho
19 Oct 11
I agree. My book is about a gal who has many powers and her adventure trying to help the world. It has all kinds of animals that are in danger of extinction and alot of crafting and such. It should be a interesting read.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
18 Oct 11
I do think that modern technology - like emails - can offer the reader a richer experience. However I don't how many people want that enhancement in the actual text of the novel. As the responses above show it seems most people prefer the traditional novel.
If you don't mind me asking, what is your to be published someday novel about? :)
1 person likes this
@Liliac26 (557)
• Romania
17 Oct 11
I prefer traditional and I don't see it as passive. As long as I can interpret what I read, identify (or not) with the characters, have a critical opinion, come up with my own version of the story, fantasise about it and so on, I don't perceive the act of reading as passive. I don't think that the reader...just reads.
I'm sure plenty of interesting things can be done with interactive novels, it sounds like an interesting concept, but I very much doubt that the traditional novel will ever disappear.
1 person likes this
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
17 Oct 11
First of all, I love your description of reading a traditional novel! The reader can indeed make the words alive - after all isn't that what reading is about? To pursue the story and live it in one's own way in one's own head?
Interactive novels have their place but they leave less of an opportunity for the reader to use his or her imagination. I believe this kind of book is good for very young children who are still learning how to read, but how can this variety be nearly as entertaining to adults or older children?
@katcarneo (1433)
• Philippines
18 Oct 11
I'm thinking maybe this can be entertaining to adults who are not exactly fond of traditional novels. I have some friends crease their brows and ask me how I could read a boring 300-page book with no pictures, and these very same friends can read the long introduction and instructions in a video game. Really, many video games look like an interactive novel to me. There's a beginning of the story, but how the story will go depends on the choices the character makes.
@katcarneo (1433)
• Philippines
18 Oct 11
It's good to see many people here still enjoy traditional novels, and I am one of them. I do remember reading an interactive Archie comic book when I was younger. There were always three choices of what Archie would do. I picked my choice and finished the story, and then later came back and picked the second choice, then picked the third. So in a way it was like 3 stories in one, so it's more work for the author and more fun for kids. I am a teacher so an interactive storytelling activity is something I like and kids like it as well.
Personally, though, I'd still prefer traditional novels. I like the excitement, or fear, or sadness and sudden happiness the twists and turns in a story can give. I read for the sake of entertainment and authors are authors because they know how to entertain people. Novels will stay, I think. Maybe more and more people will start reading e-books instead of paperbacks, but they are novels all the same.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
18 Oct 11
I agree. Choose your own adventure style books are great for kids and such because such books offer more freedom and excitement for children. I know at that age (at least for me) normal reading was like a repetitive chore.
However when we mature we change. The desire for activity that we have in childhood seems to fade. Our emotions mature and we enjoy the finer things of life with a deeper appreciation. Thus the traditional novel is highly enjoyed. I don't see it vanishing either.
@sarahruthbeth22 (43143)
• United States
17 Oct 11
When I read a novel or see a play or a film , I ask tell me a story, Not Let me help you tell a story. If I Have to help write this story, I expect to get royalties!
@crimsonladybug (3112)
• United States
17 Oct 11
When I was a kid (and I'm sure you can still find them somewhere) I loved reading the Choose Your Own Adventure series. Each book had several twists and turns that you could choose as you read. You'd read a few pages - usually five or ten at the most - and it would have an option. If you want to do this, go to this page. If you want to do that, go to this other page...and the story would continue from there. Sometimes you'd come to another choice, other times your choice would lead to the end of the story. Then you could go back to where you made that choice and read the second option. They were a lot of fun.
@whatrow (792)
• United States
17 Oct 11
I have never heard of an interactive novel. I don't see the value of that innovation. It seems to me that it is change just for the sake of change, promoted by people who are going to make money out of it. Give me printed books that I can store in my personal library.
@Awinds (2468)
• United States
17 Oct 11
Let me clarify: by passive I mean the only way you "interact" with the novel is by reading the words. There are no links, no multimedia content of anything of the sort. I don't mean passive is the way of being boring or anything like that. :)
And there is something especially enticing about a good law or mystery novel...
@Rick1950 (1576)
• Lima, Peru
24 Oct 11
I think I'd prefer traditional novel. I prefer to read on the paper than on the screen. However we should be open to the changes and these are a lot in our time. I could be part of interactive readers too. I find interesting if we can communicate with the author and have the opportunity to write in his novel. But I think traditional novel will survive in the future.